At the end of today's session we discussed the possibility of taking up prolepsis as it relates to divinity, and we'll put that on the list for attention soon.
However Robert's offhand comment about the Gassendi article has led me to realize that I don't think we've discussed that article at all in the past, and on quick reading of it I can tell we need to remedy that asap.
I will post more here as I read through the article. It has defects that we all should expect - Gassendi is a Christian and he believes in an active Providential God and an eternal soul. But at least a large part of the rest of his commentary on Epicurus seems very well grounded, so we should go through it at least enough to pick out the highs and lows to assist others reading it in the future.
So let's go ahead and plan that this be the focus of the November 9 Zoom meeting.