1. New
    1. Member Announcements
  2. Home
    1. Get Started - Activities
    2. Posting Policies
    3. Community Standards
    4. Terms of Use
    5. Moderator Team
    6. Site Map
    7. Quizzes
    8. Articles
      1. Featured Articles
      2. Blog Posts at EpicureanFriends
  3. Wiki
    1. Wiki Home
    2. FAQ
    3. Classical Epicureanism
    4. Physics
    5. Canonics
    6. Ethics
    7. Search Assistance
    8. Not NeoEpicurean
    9. Foundations
    10. Navigation Outlines
    11. Key Pages
  4. Forum
    1. New Activity
    2. New Threads
    3. Welcome
    4. General Discussion
    5. Featured
    6. Activism
    7. Shortcuts
    8. Dashboard
    9. Full Forum List
    10. Level 3+
    11. Most Discussed
  5. Podcast
    1. Lucretius Today Podcast
    2. Episode Guide
    3. Lucretius Today At Youtube
    4. EpicureanFriends Youtube Page
  6. Texts
    1. Overview
    2. Diogenes Laertius
    3. Principal Doctrines
    4. Vatican Sayings
    5. Lucretius
    6. Herodotus
    7. Pythocles
    8. Menoeceus
    9. Fragments - Usener Collection
    10. Torquatus On Ethics
    11. Velleius On Gods
    12. Greek/Latin Help
  7. Gallery
    1. Featured images
    2. Albums
    3. Latest Images
    4. Latest Comments
  8. Calendar
    1. Upcoming Events List
    2. Zoom Meetings
    3. This Month
    4. First Monday Zoom Meetings
    5. Wednesday Zoom Meeting
    6. Twentieth Zoom Meetings
    7. Zoom Meetings
  9. Other
    1. Featured Content
    2. Blog Posts
    3. Files
    4. Logbook
    5. EF ToDo List
    6. Link-Database
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
Forum

Welcome To EpicureanFriends.com!

"Remember that you are mortal, and you have a limited time to live, and in devoting yourself to discussion of the nature of time and eternity you have seen things that have been, are now, and are to come."

Sign In Now
or
Register a new account
  1. New
  2. Home
  3. Wiki
  4. Forum
  5. Podcast
  6. Texts
  7. Gallery
  8. Calendar
  9. Other
  1. EpicureanFriends - Home of Classical Epicurean Philosophy
  2. Mathitis Kipouros
  • Sidebar
  • Sidebar

Posts by Mathitis Kipouros

Regularly Checking In On A Small Screen Device? Bookmark THIS page!
  • 1
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • Epicurean substitute for prayer

    • Mathitis Kipouros
    • August 26, 2020 at 12:45 PM
    Quote from Cassius

    On the other hand if they don't understand it at all there's not much point in it.

    Yes, I agree. The point right now would be to have a placeholder for later, and not to continue reinforcing something that later on could certainly bring more confusion (the current prayers).

    Quote from Cassius

    24. If you reject any single sensation, and fail to distinguish between the conclusion of opinion, as to the appearance awaiting confirmation, and that which is actually given by the sensation or feeling, or each intuitive apprehension of the mind, you will confound all other sensations, as well, with the same groundless opinion, so that you will reject every standard of judgment. And if among the mental images created by your opinion you affirm both that which awaits confirmation, and that which does not, you will not escape error, since you will have preserved the whole cause of doubt in every judgment between what is right and what is wrong.

    I'm afraid I don't fully comprehend what this paragraph reads. I believe my English is not so bad, but please bear in mind that it is not my first language and there may be nuances here that I'm not being able to grasp. What I'm getting is: If you reject one sensation your judgement will certainly be incomplete? That first long sentence is particularly difficult for me to follow all the way to the end. The second sentence I understood as: If you affirm an image which is not confirmed by the senses in combination with the ones that have been confirmed, you would be contaminating your judgement?

    Quote from Cassius

    I feel bodies which are not myself: there are other existencies then. I call them matter. I feel them changing place. This gives me motion. Where there is an absence of matter, I call it void, or nothing, or immaterial space. On the basis of sensation, of matter and motion, we may erect the fabric of all the certainties we can have or need.

    :thumbup:

  • Epicurean substitute for prayer

    • Mathitis Kipouros
    • August 26, 2020 at 9:19 AM

    “Or pleasure. What made you the happiest today? Let your toddler reflect on what makes them happy throughout that day. ”

    I think this is a great idea, although I’d think more suited for older children, since right now I don’t think he’s yet ready to articulate something like this by himself.

    But I see the potential in getting him accustomed to doing this, and later on being able to reflect each day on how he felt about such and such, to develop this awareness of sensations and feelings. I know I would’ve benefitted from doing this, instead of just asking to be kept safe and such.

  • Epicurean substitute for prayer

    • Mathitis Kipouros
    • August 26, 2020 at 8:55 AM

    “I don't have any specific saying of Epicurus or Lucretius right now, but one option might be focusing on gratitude. What are you most thankful for today? Or come up with a rote litany like a prayer: I'm thankful for ... And... And...“

    The thing with gratitude is, as I understand it, that someone has to be the object of your gratitude, because you’re grateful that he/she has been willingly good to you, and thus you recognize this good will. Being grateful to nature or some other non human thing would have to imply endowing them with the ability to will something unto us; please share a different point of view about gratitude if you can.

    So When we tried this gratitude prayers we focused on being grateful to mom and dad for whatever (which seemed rather boastful since he’s not coming up with these thoughts 8|) and to his kinder teacher and to his grandparents and such...

  • Epicurean substitute for prayer

    • Mathitis Kipouros
    • August 26, 2020 at 8:41 AM

    Thanks guys, as usual you don’t disappoint. From your first post Cassius, I was thinking something derived from this:

    “no one can live pleasantly without living wisely, honorably, and justly, and no one wisely, honorably, and justly without living pleasantly. ”

    It’s short and it has a nice rhythm to it. Plus it’s useful to know by heart, as it would be expected to happen after daily repetition.

    But as of now, for me, honorably falls within the realm of platonic ideals, but I’m open to a more pragmatic meaning for it, like justice (don’t harm and don’t be harmed) or wisely (use sensations, feelings and reason as criteria).

  • Epicurean substitute for prayer

    • Mathitis Kipouros
    • August 25, 2020 at 11:52 PM

    I have a toddler who has a going-to-bed-routine that now involves prayer. The reasons for why this is are rather complex for me to explain here, but it shall suffice to say that it’s a deeply ingrained custom.

    The prayers are catholic, since this is the religion we were brought up with; I don’t feel comfortable making him repeat every night a prayer asking for permission to go to sleep to a non existing being and to thank another for guarding him during day and night.

    Since I didn’t have a better option, and thinking I’d have opportunity to fix this later on, I let it slip for a while, but now I’m thinking I should stop it early on.

    I say I didn’t have a better option because I do believe that this ritual puts him in the right state of mind to go to sleep, so I do think having something to reflect upon, and repeat, would be valuable; it’s the content of what he’s repeating I’m having trouble with.

    During my stoic phase I substituted the prayers, with a phrase I took from reading Marcus Aurelius, which goes something like this: “everything suits me that suits your designs oh universe, nothing comes to early or too late but in your own good time oh nature; everything comes from you, everything persists in you, and to you, all things return”

    It seems pretty innocuous and neutral, with no supernatural elements except for perhaps the “design” part of it... I think it is better than the catholic ones, but not good enough yet.

    Are there any epicurean sayings that you could recommend that could work for this?

  • Welcome LukeL!

    • Mathitis Kipouros
    • August 1, 2020 at 9:00 AM

    Welcome LukeL . The school your planning sounds like a very interesting project. Congratulations.

  • Highlights and doubts after reading Chapter 1 (Part 1 of 2)

    • Mathitis Kipouros
    • July 5, 2020 at 7:25 PM

    Just some things I've gotten out of it. Some remarks so people who haven't read it perhaps get a feeling of what it includes (witout any promise of comprehensiveness, these are just things I highlighted for myself) and some doubts (that I'll be marking with bold type) I'd like to bring to the forum to see if they can be resolved.

    • P4 "The gods are not to be feared, because 'the incorruptible being is immune to feelings of anger or gratitude'". Keeping this attitude will put the reader in "the right disposition to learn subsequent teachings".
    • P4 Epicurus employs the synoptic view as a device to facilitate teaching/learning, that goes from the general view to the details.
    • P4 "The universe consists of atoms and void" so the soul is composed of atoms. Is somebody willing to ellaborate on this point?
    • P4 Epicurus believed that the the truth can be properly described in terms of its details, parting from the whole, and only if "the beginning was rightly made", and so knowledge can be attained.
    • P5 The first text for students of Epicurs was "The Little Epitome, which is extant as the letter addressed to Herodotus".
    • P5 "Faith was recognized for the first time as a factor in happiness". I guess this will be expanded upon later in the book, but... why does faith play such an important role in Epicurean Philosophy? How is this not contradictory to its materialistic ontology and its empiricist epistemology?
    • P5 The poem of Lucretius "On the Nature of Things" is the follow-up text for the student after "the Little Epitome".
    • P5 The nature of gods, which is presumed to be the topic of the book missing from Lucretiu's poem. What is Epicurean Philosophy's stance on this topic since there is no extant text about it? Or there is?
    • P5 There is a mention about "the thirty-seven books on Physics". What is this referring to?
    • P5 The synoptic view of Epicurus and his philosophy are "presented in the form of dogmatic general statements". From my first reading, I remembered some reference about the value of dogma, but I don't know if its this one or another one later on. Dogma doesn't strike me as a constructive thing, let alone in philosophy; is this something that is just asked of the reader at the beginning because of the synoptic view, or is dogma a particularly important part of the philosophy?
    • P6 The stated objectives of the chapter are "to show where Epicurus belongs in the succession of philosophers, how his tought is related to the cultural context in which it arose, and how it survived in the cultural context into which it was finally absorbed", "to orientate the reader at the outset as to create the proper attitude for a sympathetic understanding of the man and his work; and not less to warn the reader against the disparagement and prejudice that abound in all the secondary literature".
    • P6 Diogenes Laertius wrote an "excellent biography of Epicurus" and it is used as "chief authority" on his life.
    • P7 "He was the first to promulgate a dogmatic philosophy" ... "The distinction of being a dogmatist was naturally not denied him, because it was deemed a demerit, the renunciation of inquiry". This is the part I was referring to (in my comment lines above); I too think that dogmatism is a reunciation of inquiry; how is this not in agreement with Dewitt? Am I understanding something wrong? Why does he propose dogmatism as an argument in favor of the philosophy.
    • P7 Epicurs epistemology is not empiricist in the modern sense, since "he never declared sensation to be the source of knowledge; much less did he declare all sensations to be trustworthy". What is Dewitt refering to when he says "empiricism in the modern sense"?
    • P8 Epicurus used mostly ("his chief reliance") deductive reasoning.
    • P8 "The mistake is to look upon Epicurus as an effeminate and a mora invalid". My doubt here is not specifically about the philosophy but rather how in this instance and in some other texts stoic texts I've read they refer to femininity (which I take as having a behavior that likens that of women) as a very bad thing. This hasn't aged well. My surprise here is that the one who uses this adjective is Dewitt, as he's not quoting a text of that old period. This doesn't seem to me to be very Epicurean, from what I've understood so far of Epicurus.
    • P8 "He was an altruistic hedonist".
    • P8 Epicureanism "shunted the emphasis from the political to the social virtues and offered what may be called a religion of humanity". "The mistake is to" ... "think of its founder [of the philosophy, Epicurus] as an enemy of religion". Again, religion (for me) is the epitome of dogma; how important is religion to Epicurean philosophy? Does religion here have a different connotation than what it usually means? How is somebody going to be able to learn something different (and change his/her mind to something better) if we argue in favor of dogma and religion?
    • P8 Epicureanism has survived in literature and ethics "by amalgamation with Stoicism, chiefly through Seneca and Marcus Aurelius".
    • P9 Some influences of Epicurus were Isocrates, Euclic, Diogenes, Aristotle, Aristobulus, Nearchus, the first Ptolemy.
    • P9 From Euclid he got a simple style for communicating and deductive procedures.
    • P9 From the Cynics, the quest of honesty, but repudiating "their insolence and vulgarity", emphasizing that "honesty be joined with courtesy and decorum".
    • P10 From Aristotle, "the revelation of a new order of Nature", and from here "Epicurs rejected the hypostatized Reason of Plato as the norm of truth and looked instead to Nature as furnishing the norm".
    • P10 The "chief negative influences were Platonism and oratory" which were both obsessed with politics, rendering "happines of the individual [as] inseparable from his life as a citizen".
    • P11 War ensued with the program of Platonic education, because Platonism "stood for the tight combination of ethics with politics which disqualified philosophy for universal acceptance".
    • P11 Stoicism is written off as a possible influence in the life of Epicurus.
    • P12 Sophocles may have inspired the principle that pain is evil, and Homer was cited as "authority for the doctrine that pleasure is the telos or goal of living".
    • P12 Epicurus "declared dialectic a superfluity". " He rejected geometry as having no bearing upon problems of conduct".
    • P12 Epicurus's "classification of the desires is developed from a Platonic hint, and he begins to erect his structure of hedonism from the point where this topic was left by Plato", and "more than half of his forty Authorized Doctrines are direct contradictions of Platonic teachings".
    • P13 With Aristotle he had in common a "direct analytical approach to problems as opposed to the circuitous analogical approach adopted by Plato", but Epicurus was also pragmatic at the same time.
    • P13 "There is no better preparation for the ethics of Epicurus than a perusal of that that treatise (Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle), and especially of the sections on Friendship, the Magnanimous Man, and Happiness".
    • P13 "Many anticipations of his teachings may there be identified: for example, the possibility of man's attainment to a life that in respect of quality may be called immortal or divine". Did Epicurus actually used inmortality or divinity as qualities to describe a good life? Isn't this a bit contradictory?
    • P13 "Aristotle's study of the embrio seems to have given rise to the doctrine of innate ideas or Anticipations...". It just seems kind of incongruent that they would derive conclusions from things they were unable to sense in any way, and criticize others for doing the same in a different domain. But here I have doubts I may be misunderstanding something.
    • P13 Epicurus based his theroy of pleasure and definition of justice in animal behavior.
    • P13 He studied with Nausiphanes who gave him a suggestion about a canon of truth. What suggestion would this be?
    • P14 Many explanations as to why Epicurus didn't show gratitude to his teachers.
    • P15 "he arrogated the title of Sage or Wise Man" and he was capable "of claiming perfection of knowledge, because he had approximated to the life of the gods". What do you think this means?
    • P15 He held a presumptuous attitude "virtually imperative for him as thte founder and head of a sect". The term sect to me holds a negative connotation; would you agree to call Epicurus's movement a sect?
    • P15 He revived "the tratidion of Ionian science, which had been interrupted by Socrates and Plato".
    • P15 Two separate trends can be identified in Greek philosophy: One observational and speculative, and the other mathematical and contemplative.
    • P16 Geometry inspired a movement that was romantic; Plato seemed to see in it "absolute reason contemplating absolute truth, perfect precission of concept joined with finality of demonstration". "He began to transfer the precise concepts of geometry to ethics and politics". "Especially enticing was the concept which we know as definition. This was a creation of the geometricians; they created it by defining straight lines, equilateral triangles, and other regular figures. If these can be defined, Plato tacitly reasoned, why not also justice, piety, temperance, and other virtues? This is reasoning by analogy, one of the trickiest of logical procedures. It only holds good only between sets of true similars. Virtues and triangles are not true similars. It does not follow, therefore, because equilatereal traingles can be precisely defined, that justice can be defined in the same way." This makes sense, at least at a glance. But perhaps it could be argued that it still lacks more arguments for proof. I think if this can be further developed by way of examples it could be validated, without the need for mor argumentation. Can you think of any?
    • P17 The abilities of both Socrates and Plato gave fruit to the "dramatization of logic which is called dialectic, best exemplified by the Platonic dialogues".
    • P17 "The quest of a definition, of justice, for example, presumes the existence of the thing to be defined". What would be your answer to the argument that, from this sentence, follows that justice doesn't exist?
    • P17 "Hence arose Plato's theory of ideas. The word idea means shape or form and he thought of abstract notions as having an independent existence just as geometrical figures exist, a false analogy". This was rejected as absurd by Epicurus. So... geometrical figures are things that exist, that can be abstractly defined, in terms of its relations with physical things. But the ideas of virtues, don't exist in the physical world. Then, a definition of them, eludes us, because we cannot derive it from observation of their existence in the physical world of atoms and void. Or, so we can try to define them, albeit poorly or in a very limited fashion, in abstract terms, when we observe something in the physical world that we would call is a physical manifestation of said idea, but accepting that the definition can only comprise the observed phenomenon, and hence it cannot be absolute or universal and only related to that one observation?

    I'm going ot have to finish this in another post.

  • Question From Chapter 1 on "Altruism"

    • Mathitis Kipouros
    • July 5, 2020 at 10:27 AM
    Quote from Cassius

    There's a huge difference between social utilitarianism and individual utilitarianism ?. We are definitely not social utilitarians in this philosophy.

    This makes me feel uncomfortable on a very deep level. Perhaps it is because I have accepted for a long time as true the concept that universal well-being is achievable. I am of course suspicious of its idealism, since I don't know how it could happen, and I recognize that very quickly when trying to lay a concrete pathway towards it, things start to require a lot of wichful thinking and even perhaps a little fantasy. I would like to believe that a universal utopia is achievable. But I guess, a mor realistic view of the world could show that this doesn't happen anywhere.

    As a side note, and related to the question of how people new to Epicureanism take to it: I'm entertaining this deep feeling of discomfort right now trying to come to terms with what's more likely real, rather than what is desirable but less likely. Possibly this discomfot, and our willingness/capacity to be with it, is what helps people find a relief in religion, and what causes a lower adherence to Epicureanism.

    Getting back on track, one of the reasons for this discomfot is, I think, the realization that there are people in the world that don't meet the basic needs to relieve pain or to achieve pleasure (shelter, nutrition, etc...), and the possibility (rather slim in some cases) that anyone of us could find ourselves in it at some point in our lives; I guess it is matter of just living in the moment versus having a longer term view. How could we not attend to social utilitarianism when we think of this? How can we not see that as long as we have people who can't relieve these basic pains, or achieve these basic pleasures, any equilibrium we think we have in our self sufficiency is rather unstable, because these people either some day will try to achieve them without the sophistication that comfort allows, or because they will fall prey of others for manipulation, perhaps even against us. So individual utilitarianism seems rather short-sighted for me.

    Perhaps if we see that, in nature, survival and well-being happen in larger groups, and that these groups always have some sort of justified hierarchy, we could say that a structure of society is needed to guarantee my well-being, and that for it to be stable for the longest time, this structure should have social utilitarianism in mind to guarantee the well-being of others who for whom I'm not able to look after; the hierarchy is constantly revised in order for it to keep its justified character.

    We could call this a larger group "friends", but that would be rather idealistic. The problem with calling it friends, is that it could get confusing when we remember the tightly related (to friendship) concept of loyalty, which could be defined as "I don't have to doubt you'll be there for me, and thus, you do't have to doubt it either", as, I guess more likely than not, happens with siblings (at least until a certain age where we haven't been corrupted). I such a big group, I won't always be there particularly for you, if you're not one of my true/close friends; that's just reality. Is not physically possible. My standing there shouldn't be on a basis of loyalty, but rather on a basis of how active you are in produring this society is a provider of pleasure and an eliminator of pains for the most. And what if I decide to change to another society because I think here I'm not providing, or am not being provided for, in terms of peasure/pain. I couldn't be called disloyal, I'm just attending to my individual utilitarianism, as well as the social utilitarianism of the society I'm leaving and perhaps the one I wil lbe joining.

    Also, to further delve into friendship; as stated before, it is a concept that can also very easly slip into the realm of idealism. To keep it real, we will quickly realize that true friends are those that we feel the need and pleasure to keep in our lives as we would our siblings, hence I don't believe of universal brotherly love, but I do think that with our friends, our love should be brotherly. And these people can't be many, just by the fact that we're not able to correspond or reciprocate in a convenient fashion to more than just a few. If we then try to say our friends are people who "are like us" in "this or that way", we slip into idealism. And how could our self-sufficiency be stable if we can only depend for it on such a small group of people? It's a bit of wishful thininking again.

  • Opportunities for Activism And Collaboration Here At EpicureanFriends.com

    • Mathitis Kipouros
    • July 4, 2020 at 11:24 PM
    Quote from Cassius

    I was about to stop there but perhaps it must be included that humans possess a degree of agency that assures us that neither fate nor theories of hard determinism make it useless for us to exert ourselves to improve our lives.

    For me the answer to the free will/determinism debate perhaps won't have a concrete answer, but I compare it to something I read in my Epicurean explorations about whether or not we should care about some gods that, if they exist, don't actually show godlike qualities, at least not in a way beneficial for us to care... similiarly, if free willl doesn't exist, the illussion is so real, that it actually doesn't matter.

  • Opportunities for Activism And Collaboration Here At EpicureanFriends.com

    • Mathitis Kipouros
    • July 4, 2020 at 11:17 PM
    Quote from Cassius

    (1) no supernatural realm or order, (2) no reward or punishment or life of any kind after death, (3) identification of the goal and guide of life with feeling, primarily pleasure, rather than virtue or piety; (4) the view that it is correct to be confident that we can attain knowledge that is based on"reasoning" tied tightly to the senses, the anticipations, and feelings, rather than to dialectical logic; (5) a common sense view of the universe being totally natural and effectively infinite in size, eternal in time, and in which humans on earth are neither the only life in the universe nor the highest.

    Perhaps what you've summed up here includes what I'm about to say... but it's been kind of revelatory for me now that I'm reading DeWitt. Once I read about the acceptance that Socratic, and then Platonic, thought got out of their rhetorical ability, it's started to become more evedient the extent to which "Plato's 'forms'" (or whatever you want to call these unnecessarily-complex, undefinable-definitions) have permeated everything in our world. I see plenty of conflict caused by our unconscious acceptance of the existence of things that aren't there, and that we've grown up with, and that we take for as real as the air we breathe. So one thing I would add, although, like I said, perhaps is already there, is a conscious and disciplined effort to "catch" these concepts that we normally accept automatically, because of their ubiquitous nature, and the lack of awareness of almost everybody about them.

    Trying to be more concrete, an example of this could be the "shoulds" that we think of as unavoidable: ultra competitiveness; enduring sickening stress because of a work ethic; professional success and prestige; I don't know if I'm making sense...

  • Opportunities for Activism And Collaboration Here At EpicureanFriends.com

    • Mathitis Kipouros
    • July 4, 2020 at 6:56 PM
    Quote from Cassius

    We all want to think that our way of seeing the world is the "right" one, and that everyone who is an Epicurean will agree with us, but it seems to me that that just isn't so, and it is very disappointing to people when they realize that.

    I have been liking Epicureanism so far because it's been serving me as a way to more easily identify what's right and what's wrong, without overcomplicating things. I still have the hope that this is possible. But it's also shown so far to be a bit problematic.

    When you talk to someone and try to make them see your point of view from the perspective of what makes sense (generally, no particularly you) in terms of pain or pleasure, they start to answer with mental constructions of what should be, what it's always been, what's orthodox and how that's more safe, etc... and they show an almost visceral reaction when you point that out, but that doesn't make the truth false, it just makes then inaccessible at the moment.

    This also brings to mind something I've been grappling with lately... since pleasure and pain are things you can only experience yourself, it makes it very clear that things can start to become less absolute (and thus less comfortable - hence the resistance) and more relative... perhaps a person does something that is not the best for a third party, but it brings him geunine pleasure, or it eliminates genuine pain, so he wasn't acting with harm in mind... so how can you say he is bad if he is even ignorant of the pain he's causing to said third party... If he does it after it has been brought to his attention the pain his suffering to someone else, then he would be bad, but not before? :/

  • Opportunities for Activism And Collaboration Here At EpicureanFriends.com

    • Mathitis Kipouros
    • July 4, 2020 at 6:39 PM
    Quote from Don

    You bet! It's Greek: ευ- "eu-" good as in euthanasia (good death), eulogy (good words), etc. + άγγελος "angelos" messenger as in "angel" (again, co-opted by the Christians). It literally just meant the bearer of good news (like victory in a battle) or to bring good news as a verb. The ευ/eu- got the "ev" pronunciation instead of "you" pronunciation in the c. 1st-4th c. CE when the Christians would have been appropriating and coining terms.

    Oh my... I just spiraled down the wiktionary rabbit hole again. If you search for the etimology of messenger you don't get to "angelos", but to th latin "missaticum" which comes from the verb "mitto" (to send) and "atticum" (the later as I understood it is just a suffix to indicate pertinence to the verb. Perhaps we could create our own word "eumittization"? :D:D;)

  • Opportunities for Activism And Collaboration Here At EpicureanFriends.com

    • Mathitis Kipouros
    • July 4, 2020 at 6:31 PM
    Quote from Cassius

    I think that's the area where we need more creative thought. How do we build closer bonds and get and keep motivated around a common goal, while at the same time making sure that our efforts to build numbers don't turn into a 'big tent' strategy that waters down the objective?

    I'd say the wiki, if it's collaborative, could be a great resource to start gaining terrain against the popular confusions. If it's active, I'd bet it would start to pop up more often in the first page of the search engine results. Also, it could help to tackle the most common confusions with pages that tackle them specifically/directly.

  • Opportunities for Activism And Collaboration Here At EpicureanFriends.com

    • Mathitis Kipouros
    • July 4, 2020 at 6:25 PM
    Quote from Cassius

    One thing I really think is helpful is for us to have skype conversations, and camotero (and others who are reading this and might be interested) I hope you can consider joining us on one of those.

    Yes, please count me in; I'd love to join one of those.

  • Opportunities for Activism And Collaboration Here At EpicureanFriends.com

    • Mathitis Kipouros
    • July 4, 2020 at 6:23 PM
    Quote from Cassius

    I think over the last year (almost two now) we've done a lot of work on that with the "Not NeoEpicurean" list and assorted articles elaborating on its points.

    In terms of marketing, or promotion, I heard a guru a while back say that it's always a great idea to promote by referencing to the popular thing (brand, product, whatever). People have an easier way getting to you when you connect the path to your thing to a place they already know about.

  • Opportunities for Activism And Collaboration Here At EpicureanFriends.com

    • Mathitis Kipouros
    • July 4, 2020 at 6:19 PM
    Quote from Cassius

    http://www.epicrueanfriends.com/wiki

    Hi Cassius! Is this an active project? I followed the link but encountered an error.

  • Opportunities for Activism And Collaboration Here At EpicureanFriends.com

    • Mathitis Kipouros
    • June 27, 2020 at 10:30 AM
    Quote from Cassius

    Good thoughts. What word would you suggest as more appropriate than "activism"?

    Looking back at what we wrote lines above... I don't think we did a good job at addressing your question. I think a better word would, in this case, would be "collaboration". "Opportunities for collaboration". All of the said things about evangelism still stand, but the opportunities are not for "evangelization", but rather for collaboration towards that "evangelical" effort.

  • Opportunities for Activism And Collaboration Here At EpicureanFriends.com

    • Mathitis Kipouros
    • June 27, 2020 at 10:28 AM
    Quote from Cassius

    It is definitely taking longer to make progress then I had hoped, but I do think the participants here already have helped build a resource the likes of which have not been available for a very long time. And we have taken steps to identify a core of people who are not content to define their goal in life as a pseudonym for nothingness.

    I think most of us here already can articulate that vision in core terms that are sufficient for our day to day use, even while we enjoy pursuing further details.

    As I see it, this is the "base camp" for the "strain" of Epicurean Philosophy you're promoting. I use "strain", because, [apparently to me] like it or not, this is an alternate path from the popular consensus, and from the academy; this comes from my yet-very-poor knowledge about this "strain". But if I were wrong (and I've already found the thread about Epicurean documents - from Charles - that makes me think that perhaps I am), this could be the "base camp of Classical Epicurean Philosophy", and an effort would be worth it to promote it as such, and also to keep the quality and level of posting around here "high" (as it seems to me you're doing already).

    Quote from Cassius

    so the issue is how to find and connect with those, who aren't necessarily going to be found on Facebook or Reddit or Twitter, or hanging out in philosophy interest groups (the last of which is possibly the most toxic of all, as it appeals to eclecticism and skepticism).

    From the basis of what I said lines above, I would suggest exploring the possibility to create a "wiki-style" section of the platform, where users with the right privileges would write and edit the resources put there, and that could be accesible from the outside as the go-to place of everything Classical Epicureanism. This wiki would allow to keep the forum focused on conversations, and have a separate side for definitions and reference to resources. Easier said than done, I would guess. But I've seen it applied to many different groups of interest throughout the internet, so perhaps it is feasible. One of the advantages of it is that you could keep this forum closed from the search engines to allow for the privacy need for quality discussion and conversations, and have the wiki with all the accepted definitions open to anyone with access to a search engine; and when somebody looks for something they've heard about, they would come up with the wiki, instead of another source of the academic consensus that could get them confused.

  • Opportunities for Activism And Collaboration Here At EpicureanFriends.com

    • Mathitis Kipouros
    • June 27, 2020 at 10:04 AM
    Quote from Cassius

    Good thoughts. What word would you suggest as more appropriate than "activism"?

    Quote from Don

    but even DeWitt used it to describe Epicureanism.

    That's what I was going to propose; looking if Dewitt proposed something.


    Quote from Don

    the word that maybe best describes what you're proposing is evangelism.

    This came to mind as well. But I do think that, while evangelism has been used more often in secular contexts (it's even used in the to talk about the promotion of consumer products), it does have a religious load within it that may deter some people who would otherwise get interested and benefit from these "teachings towards living a good life".

    Having said that, we do not need to go around using it in every propagandistic (talk about loaded terms) effort. It could be used as a word that "within the circle" is clearly defined as not relgious, and used only in its secular connotation of bringing the good news; a connotation that, apparently is recognized (from the Wiktionary):

    Etymology[edit]

    From Old French évangéliser, from Latin evangelizare, from Ancient Greek εὐαγγελίζω (euangelízō)

    Verb[edit]

    evangelize (third-person singular simple present evangelizes, present participle evangelizing, simple past and past participle evangelized)

    1. To tell people about (a particular branch of) Christianity, especially in order to convert them; to preach the gospel to. quotations ▼
    2. To preach any ideology to those who have not yet been converted to it. quotations ▼
    3. To be enthusiastic about something, and to attempt to share that enthusiasm with others; to promote.

    None of the ones I put in bold talk about having the goal of converting anyone, bu rather more about where the effort is focused and that it implies some joy on the part of the promoter, which I guess are rather descriptive of what we're talking about in this thread.

    So perhaps, if it were clearly stated, somewhere around the site, that the meaning of the word as used here absolutely does not imply the religious connotation, it could be used to clearly convey what we're talking about; and if we (as DeWitt does in his book about having a need to constantly remind of the falsehoods attributed to Epicurus) take the time to make the necessary clarification in the posts or communications more directed towards newer audiences, we would be diminishing the risk of confusion.

    Apparently the word was coopted by religion later, but at the beginning it didn't have that religious connotation. I kept reading and I found this about its etimology:

    Latin[edit]

    Etymology[edit]

    Late Latin borrowing from rare Ancient Greek εὐαγγελίζω (euangelízō), active voice variant of deponent εὐαγγελίζομαι (euangelízomai, “I bring good news; I preach the Gospel”), from εὐ- (eu-, “good”) +‎ ἄγγελος (ángelos, “messenger, envoy”), of uncertain origin.

    Ancient Greek[edit]

    Etymology[edit]

    Cognate with Mycenaean Greek 𐀀𐀐𐀫 (a-ke-ro), but origin uncertain. Probably a loanword, and probably related to ἄγγαρος (ángaros, “Persian mounted courier”) (whence Latin angarius), which is probably from an East Asian language...

    Noun[edit]

    ἄγγελος • (ángelos) m (genitive ᾰ̓γγέλου); second declension (Epic, Attic, Ionic, Doric, Koine)

    1. a messenger
    2. one that announces
    3. (later) angel, heavenly spirit
  • Opportunities for Activism And Collaboration Here At EpicureanFriends.com

    • Mathitis Kipouros
    • June 27, 2020 at 1:33 AM

    This may be a bit off-topic, but I must say the title is a bit misleading with the “activism” in it. Perhaps I’m mistaken but for me it connotes political and or social change-seeking activities.

    Other than that, I can only complement by sharing that it’s noteworthy for me that you didn’t include the Dewitt's thread as one of the places to engage more in order to have more of the dabbling Epicureans dive deeper.

    Also, the Lucretius podcast is a lot of fun, but it is indeed (and I think you may have implied this too in one of your posts) a bit harder to digest for people new to the Epicurean philosophy since, even though you guys do a great job at trying to make it relatable to this newer audience (believe me, it’s part of what’s gotten me hooked), it’s not addressing directly the common confusions that exist, and that I assume you bundle in “neo-Epicureanism”.

    Oh, and also, I like the overall strategy you’re proposing here, great work; I’m looking forward to know more about this Epicurean College.

  • 1
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8

Unread Threads

    1. Title
    2. Replies
    3. Last Reply
    1. ⟐ as the symbol of the philosophy of Epicurus 65

      • Like 2
      • michelepinto
      • March 18, 2021 at 11:59 AM
      • General Discussion
      • michelepinto
      • May 20, 2025 at 9:40 AM
    2. Replies
      65
      Views
      8.8k
      65
    3. Kalosyni

      May 20, 2025 at 9:40 AM
    1. Analysing movies through an Epicurean lens 16

      • Like 1
      • Rolf
      • May 12, 2025 at 4:54 PM
      • General Discussion
      • Rolf
      • May 19, 2025 at 12:45 AM
    2. Replies
      16
      Views
      879
      16
    3. Matteng

      May 19, 2025 at 12:45 AM
    1. "All Models Are Wrong, But Some Are Useful" 4

      • Like 2
      • Cassius
      • January 21, 2024 at 11:21 AM
      • General Discussion
      • Cassius
      • May 14, 2025 at 1:49 PM
    2. Replies
      4
      Views
      1.3k
      4
    3. kochiekoch

      May 14, 2025 at 1:49 PM
    1. Is All Desire Painful? How Would Epicurus Answer? 24

      • Like 1
      • Cassius
      • May 7, 2025 at 10:02 PM
      • General Discussion
      • Cassius
      • May 10, 2025 at 3:42 PM
    2. Replies
      24
      Views
      1.3k
      24
    3. sanantoniogarden

      May 10, 2025 at 3:42 PM
    1. Pompeii Then and Now 7

      • Like 2
      • kochiekoch
      • January 22, 2025 at 1:19 PM
      • General Discussion
      • kochiekoch
      • May 8, 2025 at 3:50 PM
    2. Replies
      7
      Views
      1.2k
      7
    3. kochiekoch

      May 8, 2025 at 3:50 PM

Latest Posts

  • Article: Scientists in a race to discover why our Universe exists

    Rolf May 20, 2025 at 11:52 AM
  • ⟐ as the symbol of the philosophy of Epicurus

    Kalosyni May 20, 2025 at 9:40 AM
  • Happy Twentieth of May 2025!

    Cassius May 20, 2025 at 9:05 AM
  • Episode 281 - Is Pain The Greatest Evil - Or Even An Evil At All? - Part One - Not Yet Recorded

    Eikadistes May 19, 2025 at 6:17 PM
  • New "TWENTIERS" Website

    Cassius May 19, 2025 at 4:30 PM
  • Sabine Hossenfelder - Why the Multiverse Is Religion

    Eikadistes May 19, 2025 at 3:39 PM
  • What Makes Someone "An Epicurean?"

    Eikadistes May 19, 2025 at 1:06 PM
  • Analysing movies through an Epicurean lens

    Matteng May 19, 2025 at 12:45 AM
  • Personal mottos?

    Kalosyni May 18, 2025 at 9:22 AM
  • The Garland of Tranquility and a Reposed Life

    Kalosyni May 18, 2025 at 9:07 AM

EpicureanFriends - Classical Epicurean Philosophy

  1. Home
    1. About Us
    2. Classical Epicurean Philosophy
  2. Wiki
    1. Getting Started
  3. Frequently Asked Questions
    1. Site Map
  4. Forum
    1. Latest Threads
    2. Featured Threads
    3. Unread Posts
  5. Texts
    1. Core Texts
    2. Biography of Epicurus
    3. Lucretius
  6. Articles
    1. Latest Articles
  7. Gallery
    1. Featured Images
  8. Calendar
    1. This Month At EpicureanFriends
Powered by WoltLab Suite™ 6.0.22
Style: Inspire by cls-design
Stylename
Inspire
Manufacturer
cls-design
Licence
Commercial styles
Help
Supportforum
Visit cls-design
  • Everywhere
  • Forum
  • Articles
  • Blog Articles
  • Files
  • Gallery
  • Events
  • Pages
  • Wiki
  • Help
  • FAQ
  • More Options
foo