This thread is for discussion of the list of twelve fundamentals such as suggested by DeWitt or Clay here:
Twelve Fundamentals of Nature - Epicureanfriends.com
www.epicureanfriends.com
General Notes On Fundamentals of Nature
Regularly Checking In On A Small Screen Device? Bookmark THIS page!
Sunday Weekly Zoom. This and every upcoming Sunday at 12:30 PM EDT we will continue our new series of Zoom meetings targeted for a time when more of our participants worldwide can attend. This week our special topic will be: "Is Pain Properly Considered To Be An Evil?" To find out how to attend CLICK HERE.
-
-
This thread is for discussion of the list of twelve fundamentals such as suggested by DeWitt or Clay
Just to be clear, if anyone - DeWitt, Clay, Cassius, me, etc., - wants to assemble twelve "fundamentals" they're welcome to do it. There is zero fragmentary evidence for any definitive list of "twelve fundamentals" that Epicurus wrote and circulated. The only place this occurs - the ONLY place as far as I can find - is is the one in Diogenes Laertius (10.44): colour varies with the arrangement of the atoms he states in his "Twelve Rudiments". Δώδεκα στοιχειώσεσί ; further, that they are not of any and every size ; at any rate no atom has ever been seen by our sense.
I think any of us could go through the letter to Herodotus, or to Pythocles, or Lucretius, and pull out twelve random "fundamentals" in Epicurean physics... and it would be just as "authoritative" as the one DeWitt and Clay put together. We have no idea what was contained in Epicurus' "Twelve Rudiments" other than that he said:
- color varies with the arrangement of the atoms
- atoms aren't of any and every size
- no atom has ever been seen by our senses
...according to Diogenes Laertius. And we don't know if those 3 were "rudiments/fundamentals" or if they were describing another fundamental or... anything.
This is a soapbox of mine that I insist on standing on every once in a while. Finis for now.
-
One could also dig through Lucretius, but your point stands Don.
-
I'm with Don on this one. I have nothing against the fundamentals as they are all in line with Epicurean physics as we know it, but please consider changing introductory sentence:
'The Elementary Principles of Nature below are as set forth by Epicurus and summarized in English by Norman Dewitt in his book “Epicurus And His Philosophy.”'
This statement is misleading. The elementary principles are set forth by Norman Dewitt and are based on Epicurean physics. Dewitt didn't just summarize these - he compiled the list. Until we know otherwise, we can't claim that Epicurus set these twelve fundamentals forth.
Also a technical remark - the links to each of the principles are currently broken.
