I’ve been looking at the quote from Tusculan Disputations (either 3.41 or 3.18 depending on the numbering) where Epicurus is quoted as unable to find any good outside of taste, music, figures in motion etc. In some translations ‘sex’ is in there as well but in others it is absent.
I speak no Latin so I wasn’t able to figure out if there was an ambiguity that could legitimately be translated either way? Or if some translations are simply being prudish and inaccurate?
Related, I’ve seen two different section numbering systems for the Disputations. Is that simply due to two different early/influential versions using different methods?