Thank you so much! Glad to be here. In addition to what I said to Cassius (posted above), I'll add that I found Epicureanism through general reading in classical philosophy, and I was attracted to it because of the focus on both theoretical and practical ethics. I was particularly interested in philosophical therapy (which also drew me to Marcus Aurelius at the time, though over time I've been less influenced by Marcus's philosophy, while still appreciating his style). I've seen posts from this community on Google searches a number of times over the years, and I've been consistently impressed by the focus on classical texts and perspectives.
By the way, I might recommend Tim O'Keefe's Epicureanism book over DeWitt. Although DeWitt has some important merits, and can certainly provide a good introduction, one of my main complaints is his dismissal of later Epicureanism as derivative. I think that later Epicureanism was quite frequently innovative (not as different from Epicurus as, for example, later Stoics were from earlier ones; but still meaningfully different).