We are now requiring that new registrants confirm their request for an account by email. Once you complete the "Sign Up" process to set up your user name and password, please send an email to the New Accounts Administator to obtain new account approval.
Here in this article we can see how Aristotle writes about goods.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/44984429
Recently on the podcast Cassius and Joshua have been working on refuting Cicero's "On Ends", and I've been wondering if Cicero does take some of his views from Aristotle.
Also, perhaps Epicurus also took some of what Aristotle said, but yet he reframed and reworked it into a very different aim: we need external goods to have the most pleasant life (with pleasure as the goal and not virtue).
I found this very interesting website which gives updates on space weather and space phenomenon, with interesting nearly daily changing updates. Today's entry talks about sunspot AR3599 and SAR arcs.
Wednesday Night 8pm ET - Vatican Sayings 75, 76, & 77!
Open to Level 03+ members and Level 01 by pre-approval of the moderating team.
Agenda:
VS75. The saying, “look to the end of a long life,” shows ungratefulness for past good fortune.
VS76. You are, in your old age, just such as I urge you to be, and you have seen the difference between studying philosophy for oneself and proclaiming it to Greece at large; I rejoice with you.
VS77. The greatest fruit of self-sufficiency is freedom.
Looking ahead:
March 13 - VS 78 & 79
March 20 - VS 80 & 81
March 27 - 1st of Usener fragments discussion
This came up very briefly in last night's Zoom meeting (here is a full quote):
"It is not good to desire what is impossible, and to endeavour to enunciate a uniform theory about everything; accordingly, we ought not here to adopt the method, which we have followed in our researches into Ethics, or in the solution of the problems of natural philosophy." - Letter to Pythocles, Yonge translation
Thank you to all who came to our First Monday Zoom discussion last night. We had a total of seven people. I greatly enjoyed our discussion on "don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good".
TauPhi brought up that the aphorism can also be about spending too much time over-thinking instead of taking action (if I am paraphrasing correctly)...which totally makes sense, and which I hadn't though of before.
Cassius presented several good questions to spur on the discussion regarding the aphorism...one such question being if any of us found that we dealt with this in our own lives.
We discussed several places within Epicurean philosophy which can be related to this aphorism....and this came up, the Letter to Pythocles.
This riddle presents a scenario where a father is covered with a blanket and his son is asked to admit that he does not know who is beneath the covering.
This occured to me when pondering the paradox (and this may going off in a completely different direction and not the intended use of this paradox) but it could be of use when someone insists that the know everything (a common idea in immature young people is that they think that they are so smart that they know everything), and it can show that there are some things which we can know and some which we can't know (the mature adult easily understands this) and the point being that there are many things which we can't know (the future, other peoples thoughts or motives, and even the results of our actions)
A slightly similar yet different phrase: "Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater":
One place in which we "don't throw the baby out with the bathwater" is in De Rerum Natura which we know has some places with scientifically incorrect causations, but yet there still are many good and beneficial aspects to Lucretius' writing.
This excerpt from the wall of Diogenes of Oenoanda may somewhat pertain to the idea of "not letting the perfect be the enemy of the good":
If, gentlemen, the point at issue between these people and us involved inquiry into «what is the means of happiness?» and they wanted to say «the virtues» (which would actually be true), it would be unnecessary to take any other step than to agree with them about this, without more ado. But since, as I say, the issue is not «what is the means of happiness?» but «what is happiness and what is the ultimate goal of our nature?», I say both now and always, shouting out loudly to all Greeks and non-Greeks, that pleasure is the end of the best mode of life, while the virtues, which are inopportunely messed about by these people (being transferred from the place of the means to that of the end), are in no way an end, but the means to the end.
So it looks like Sturgeons are both much larger and much tastier than sprats and therefore very easy to distinguish from each other?
Yes, and sturgeons provide enough meat for many people and were served at feasts in ancient times.
Truly those who disregard pleasure itself are free to say that they do not prefer a sturgeon to a sprat; but he who places his supreme good in pleasure must judge of everything by sense and not by reason, and must say that those things are best which are most tasty.
Just for fun here is information about the sprat (slightly smaller than a herring, they grow up to 18 cm (about 7 inches):
And info about sturgeons (can grew up to 12ft long and sometimes bigger):
Coming up this next Monday is our First Monday Epicurean Philosophy Discussion - Via Zoom at 8pm ET - Open to forum members.
Agenda:
1. Welcome
2. Meet-and-greet for any new members who have not previously attended a Zoom meeting
3. Epicurean Philosophy Discussion
This month's topic: "Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good" - see this thread for more on the topic.
We'll have time for open discussion beyond the special topic, such as current popular forum threads or questions.
If you are new or haven't attended before then let us know if you are interested by posting in this thread or message Cassius or myself.
Previous attendees will already be on the list and will receive a private message about a day or two before the meeting which will contain the link (no need to RSVP beforehand). Hope to see you there! 
Thanks Don ! I also think it could nice to learn both modern Greek and ancient Greek at the same time, just in case I want to visit some Greek islands (no actual plans yet). I see that the pronounciation must be different between ancient and modern, and I found this on Wikipedia:
The Greek alphabet is the ancestor of the Latin and Cyrillic scripts.[6] Like Latin and Cyrillic, Greek originally had only a single form of each letter; it developed the letter case distinction between uppercase and lowercase in parallel with Latin during the modern era. Sound values and conventional transcriptions for some of the letters differ between Ancient and Modern Greek usage because the pronunciation of Greek has changed significantly between the 5th century BC and today. Modern and Ancient Greek also use different diacritics, with modern Greek keeping only the stress accent (acute) and the diaeresis.
But that may make it too complicated to learn both at the same time... perhaps I'll start with modern and learn some basic words for travel and basic communication 
I see that there are a number of good videos which have been linked in this thread (especially in post 20). I just found this video, and looks like he mentions that he uses "standard/Erasmian" pronounciation... this video is for absolute beginners (like me) to learn the alphabet.
Wednesday Night 8pm ET - Vatican Sayings 73 & 74!
Open to Level 03+ members and Level 01 by pre-approval of the moderating team.
Agenda:
VS73. The occurrence of certain bodily pains assists us in guarding against others like them.
VS74. In a philosophical discussion he who is defeated gains more, since he learns more.
*Note: We have four more meetings on the Vatican Sayings before we will move on to discuss a select number of Usener Fragments. So that we can focus on those with the most significance, we are working on a list that highlights those which we don't normally come across in Diogenes Laertius or Lucretius, and that curated list is here. We are going through the full Erik Anderson list and pulling out those which will best be suited for the zoom meetings, and if you have any suggestions for additions to or deletions from the list please use the comment feature on the page where we are setting this up.
Feb. 28 - VS 73 & 74
March 6 - VS 75, 76, & 77
March 13 - VS 78 & 79
March 20 - VS 80 & 81
March 27 - 1st of Usener fragments discussion
I found this video to be very good with relaxation (good for when you are feeling too amped up but need to go to bed, plus many other situations).
Also to me this illustrates the kind of control that we can learn to exert over our ourselves (and our free agency) once we know about this then we can choose when to apply it. It is not meditation and does not require practice - once you know about it then you can do it.
From the description: "Andrew Huberman reveals a simple breathing exercise that acts as a kill switch for stress. It's called the "physiological sigh" or "cyclic sigh", and it can help you short circuit the stressful response." (video is 11 min. long)
And this:
I just found this, which brings up more ideas (have not fully read it yet, plus I am behind on reading the newest posts above).
And a review of his book "Free Agents: How Evolution Gave Us Free Will"
Here is the section from Letter to Menoeceus (Saint Andre translation) that is relevant to this discussion:
"For he holds that we are responsible for what we achieve, even though some things happen by necessity, some by chance, and some by our own power, because although necessity is not accountable he sees that chance is unstable whereas the things that are within our power have no other master, so that naturally praise and blame are inseparably connected to them. [note] Indeed he sees that it would be better even to cleave to the myths about the gods (since that leaves some hope of prevailing upon them through worship) than to be subject to the destiny of the scientists (since that way lies an inexorable necessity). [note] And such a man holds that Fate is not a god (as most people believe) because a god does nothing disorderly, and he holds that Fate is not an uncertain cause because nothing good or bad with respect to a completely happy life is given to men by chance, although it does provide the beginnings of both great goods and great evils."
Don have you read Sam Harris' book "Free Will" published in 2012?
I wonder if the only thing new in the Sapolsky book is more detailed science. I did not listen to the audio link, and likely will not because after reading Sam Harris' book, I came to my own conclusion regarding this problem.
As soon as we think or speak the words "there is no free will" then it leads to thoughts and words such as either "I have no control over my life" or "I have very little control over my life" and then that leads to further problems and likely a very negative attitude.
So then I must take for my own awareness and my own belief for my self and my body that "I have choices and the power to make choices", but other people are outside of my power - and I cannot hold other human beings to "free will" because they are outside of my personal power to make choices.
But also, we know that some things happen through the power of our choice and some things happen due to chance. Not everything is under our control, but with an optimistic attitude we can go much further with a belief that we have the power to act. And we need to be grounded in reality so as to be clear about the things in the world and in life that we do have the ability to affect and act upon.
There are three ongoing lists created by Cassius. The second one (not Neo-Epicurean but Epicurean) was created as a collaboration between several early members of the forum. And the FAQ page has been developed over time as an outgrowth of the forum. All of this could be used to create an "EpicureanFriends Tenets of Epicurean Philosophy". I am thinking to take this on as project and will post more soon.
Here are the lists that we have right now:
1. Core Aspects of Epicurean Philosophy Emphasized at EpicureanFriends.com
2. General Principles - Not Neo-Epicurean But Epicurean
3. FAQ page
