https://www.instagram.com/p/CP5y0_qCrjy/
This Instagram post I saw today seemed unintentionally Epicurean.
New Graphics: Are You On Team Epicurus? | Comparison Chart: Epicurus vs. Other Philosophies | Chart Of Key Epicurean Quotations | Accelerating Study Of Canonics Through Philodemus' "On Methods Of Inference" | Note to all users: If you have a problem posting in any forum, please message Cassius
https://www.instagram.com/p/CP5y0_qCrjy/
This Instagram post I saw today seemed unintentionally Epicurean.
Here's Epicurus's biography translated as it appears in the Chronicle:
Epicurus was, according to the testimony of Metrodorus, an Athenian philosopher. Heraclitus says that he was raised on Samos. He came back to Athens at the age of eighteen, when Xenocrates was teaching at the Academy, and Aristotle had his school at Chalcide. But after the death of Alexander, and with Macedonian and Greek affairs against king Perdiccas in a bad way, he went to his father at Colophon. There he gathered disciples and returned to Athens under Anaxicrates. After he, with others, had taught for some time, he originated the sect called after him. And although one called Epictetus (Epitectus) strove against him, all other philosophers were agreeable to him.[Epictetus (c. 55–c. 135 CE) was a famous Greek Stoic philosopher who lived more than three centuries after Epicurus, so he could only in a metaphorical sense ‘strive against' Epictetus. Perhaps the chronicler suggests that] In his native land he was honored with bronze statues. Diocles says that Epicurus lived on a very scant diet. He was born seven years after the death of Plato, and died at Athens at the age of 72 years by a stone blocking the exit of his urine.[Epicurus was born in 342 BCE on the island of Samos. At 18 he came to Athens, and there probably studied under Xenocrates, who at that time was head of the Academy. After a short stay Epicurus went to Colophon, and later resided at Mytilene and Lampsaeus, in which places he taught philosophy for five years. At 35 he again went to Athens and established a philosophical school, called after him, the Epicurians. there he spent the remainder of his life with numerous friends and pupils. His mode of living was simple, temperate and cheerful; and the aspersions of comic poets and later philosophers opposed to him, describing him as a person of sensual pleasures, do not seem entitled to credit. He took no part in public affairs, and died at the age of 72 after a long and painful illness, which he endured with true philosophic patience and courage. He is said to have written 300 volumes, and of these the most important was , in 37 volumes. All his works are lost except some fragments of this one. He made ethics the most important part of his system, since he regarded human happiness as the ultimate end of all philosophy. Pleasure with him was not a mere momentary and transitory sensation, but he conceived it as something lasting and imperishable, consisting in pure and noble mental enjoyments, free from all influences which disturb one's peace of mind. Peace of mind was his sumum bonum.]
https://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi/t/text/tex…001.0004%3A7.30
PS: Note that the Latin text ends after Epicurus's death. The italicized sections above are commentary of the translators, as far as I can tell. If anyone else has additional information on where that part comes from, please feel free to comment.
PD17 Ὁ δίκαιος ἀταρακτότατος, ὁ δ’ ἄδικος πλείστης ταραχῆς γέμων.
One who is just, moral, and virtuous has peace of mind; but one who is unjust is overflowing with agitation, confusion, and uncertainty. (ταραχῆς, i.e., the opposite of αταραξία).
If you are just in your dealings with other people, moral in your actions, and do your best to display fair behavior, you have no need to be troubled. You've done your best. Don't get me wrong. Bad things will happen to you, and some people still won't like you. But you don't control that. Your mind can be at peace. On the other hand, if you treat people poorly, display amoral behavior, and are basically an objectively poor excuse for a human being, you have reason to be troubled! People will be out to get you. If you're the latter, you need to have some frank speech with yourself and get on the right track. To paraphrase Wil Wheaton: Don't be a jerk! If you take his advice, you and all of us who interact with you will be the better for it.
I had the chance to lay my hands on an actual (not a facsimile) of a 1493 Nuremberg Chronicle with the (unflattering) portrait of Epicurus. Just wanted to share the photos
Check out the tiny wormholes!
I was thinking it would fall under their insights l indifferents or maybe the things you can control and the things you can't.
Reminds me of a line we don't talk about too often:
QuoteWe must then bear in mind that the future is neither ours, nor yet wholly not ours, so that we may not altogether expect it as sure to come, nor abandon hope of it, as if it will certainly not come.
This almost sounds like a Stoic quote, but I'm glad of that! They don't own this concept of being aware of what's in our control and what isn't. This is a good one!
I'll break my lopsided homemade one out ![]()
You're absolutely right that if Epicurus didn't address "everyday fears" there wouldn't be any use to his philosophy. So, that being said, I think you're on track in that we have to assume he did. In my view, Epicurus was adamant that philosophy had to have practical applications for one's whole life; otherwise, it was useless.
In my reading of your post, it seems to me to go back to assessing what will happen if this desire is fulfilled and what if it is not. Your diving example is a good example of this practical application. Philosophy doesn't need to be Capital-P Philosophical. There's no ultimate cosmic outcome either way in jumping. It's not a meaning of life epiphany if you jump or don't jump. BUT (unbeknownst to you at the time), you weighed the benefits of jumping against jumping and found you were curious enough to overcome your fear to see if jumping vs not jumping provided more pleasure. I'm sure there was an aspect of peer pressure too that could have brought some pain. Jumping eliminated that too.
It's important to remember too from that excerpt from the Letter that Epicurus didn't write "happiness" with the baggage that English word has. It's part of it, but the word he used is eudaimonia. I've gone through and pulled out other occurrences to give maybe a better idea what that word means:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eudaimonia
VS 33. The body cries out to not be hungry, not be thirsty, not be cold. Anyone who has these things, and who is confident of continuing to have them, can rival the gods for **happiness.** σαρκὸς φωνὴ τὸ μὴ πεινῆν, τὸ μὴ διψῆν, τὸ μὴ ῥιγοῦν· ταῦτα γὰρ ἔχων τις καὶ ἐλπίζων ἕξειν [hope or expect to have] κἂν <διὶ [dative of Zeus]> ὑπὲρ **εὐδαιμονίας** μαχέσαιτο. [contend/compete]
Letter to Menoikeus: Someone who says that the time to love and practice wisdom has not yet come or has passed is like someone who says that the time for **happiness** has not yet come or has passed.
ὁ δὲ λέγων ἢ μήπω τοῦ φιλοσοφεῖν ὑπάρχειν ὥραν ἢ παρεληλυθέναι τὴν ὥραν, ὅμοιός ἐστιν τῷ λέγοντι πρὸς **εὐδαιμονίαν** ἢ μὴ παρεῖναι τὴν ὥραν ἢ μηκέτι εἶναι.
Therefore, you *must* study and meditate on those things which produce **eudaimonia!** For if that is present, we truly have everything; but if that is not present, we will do everything to have it.
μελετᾶν οὖν χρὴ τὰ ποιοῦντα τὴν εὐδαιμονίαν, εἴπερ παρούσης μὲν αὐτῆς πάντα ἔχομεν, ἀπούσης δέ πάντα πράττομεν εἰς τὸ ταύτην ἔχειν.
Letter to Pythocles: DL X[116]
[116] For such folly as this would not possess the most ordinary being if ever so little enlightened, much less one who enjoys **perfect felicity.**
"All this, Pythocles, you should keep in mind ;
οὐδὲ γὰρ εἰς τὸ τυχὸν ζῷον, κἂν <εἰ> μικρὸν χαριέστερον εἴη, ἡ τοιαύτη μωρία ἐμπέσοι, μὴ ὅτι εἰς παντελῆ **εὐδαιμονίαν** κεκτημένον [aquire, possess, own].
"Ταῦτα δὴ πάντα, Πυθόκλεις, μνημόνευσον:
Laërtius commentary not Epicurus: DL X [121]
[121] Two sorts of **happiness** can be conceived, the one the highest possible, such as the gods enjoy, which cannot be augmented, the other admitting addition and subtraction of pleasures.
We must now proceed to his letter.
"Epicurus to Menoeceus, greeting.
Τὴν **εὐδαιμονίαν** διχῆ νοεῖσθαι, τήν τε ἀκροτάτην, οἵα ἐστὶ περὶ τὸν θεόν, ἐπίτασιν οὐκ ἔχουσαν: καὶ τὴν <κατὰ τὴν> προσθήκην καὶ ἀφαίρεσιν ἡδονῶν.
Μετιτέον δ᾽ ἐπὶ τὴν ἐπιστολήν.
"Ἐπίκουρος Μενοικεῖ χαίρειν.
Paragraph directly before DL gives the Kuriai Doxai: Come, then, let me set the seal, so to say, on my entire work as well as on this philosopher's life by citing his Sovran Maxims,138 therewith bringing the whole work to a close and making the end of it to coincide with the beginning of happiness.
Καὶ φέρε οὖν δὴ νῦν τὸν κολοφῶνα, ὡς ἂν εἴποι τις, ἐπιθῶμεν τοῦ παντὸς συγγράμματος καὶ τοῦ βίου τοῦ φιλοσόφου, τὰς Κυρίας αὐτοῦ δόξας παραθέμενοι καὶ ταύταις τὸ πᾶν σύγγραμμα κατακλείσαντες, τέλει χρησάμενοι τῇ τῆς **εὐδαιμονίας** ἀρχῇ.
548. **Happiness** and bliss# are produced not by great riches nor vast possessions nor exalted occupations nor positions of power, but rather by peace of mind, freedom from pain, and a disposition of the soul that sets its limits in accordance with nature. τὸ **εὔδαιμον** καὶ μακάριον οὐ χρημάτων πλῆθος οὐδὲ πραγμάτων ὄγκος οὐδʼ ἀρχαί τινες ἔχουσιν οὐδὲ δυνάμεις, ἀλλʼ ἀλυπία καὶ πραότης παθῶν καὶ διάθεσις ψυχῆς τὸ κατὰ φύσιν ὁρίζουσα.
#The same word is used here as the word describing the gods in Principal Doctrine 1 and is usually translated blessed, blissful there.
There's a lot going on and translating it happiness does the word/concept a disservice.
Finally, your point about "
it wouldn’t lead him to avoid his work and sit in his room on a zafu cushion" seems to me a non sequitur. Meditation does not mean avoiding work. I'm not soapboxing here, but I see no issue with incorporating meditation ("on a zafu cushion") into an Epicurean practice. It can be a way of bringing clarity to one's mind, calming thoughts, and being better able to assess "what will happen if this desire is fulfilled/unfulfilled" in the moment.
Thanks for the thought-provoking post!!
Unfortunatelyy, Berossus isn't mentioned by Lucretius in the Latin
:
Quoteluciferam partem glomeraminis atque pilai; ut Babylonica Chaldaeum doctrina refutans astrologorum artem contra convincere tendit, 5.727
I spoke too soon. Check out next week's episode for more info on Berossus! (How's that for a teaser
)
Personally the most jarring thing for me was the way she referenced famous lines by prominent English poets.
If I remember correctly, the lines she quotes have their origin in Lucretius.
(I should say, a lot of the lines had their origin in Lucretius.)
I like Stallings as well, it's an attempt to make DRN more relatable to us modern folks. Which of course has pros and cons.
I am always impressed by her commitment to maintaining the poetic meter throughout the work.
If someone wants "poetry" I would send them to Rolfe Humphries' "the way things are. If someone wants the current standard, I would send them to Smith's Hackett edition.
I admit my "poetry" preference is Stallings since hers is the one I first read all the way through.
Some episode notes:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berossus?wprov=sfla1 The Chaldean/Babylonian astronomer
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?do…try=pedetemptim pedetemptim...
And the elephant reference http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?do…8&lang=original There's also the superstition that elephants won't cross an unsafe bridge, but I'm not sure how old that is. "Popular belief held that elephants had instincts that would make them avoid setting foot on unsafe structures." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eads_Bridge?wprov=sfla1
Agreed. "Readers Digest Condensed Epicurean philosophy"
I checked the Arundel manuscript of DL and the Principal Doctrines are <6 pages. I'm curious to check any breaks in the text and see if they line up to natural breaks in the text flow of ideas/themes.
Lo and behold, I found some earlier Greek manuscripts (< 1400) digitized online so I can't compare those too. Don't hold your breath, but it'll be on my list of things to do. ![]()
Agreed. "Readers Digest Condensed Epicurean philosophy"
I checked the Arundel manuscript of DL and the Principal Doctrines are <6 pages. I'm curious to check any breaks in the text and see if they line up to natural breaks in the text flow of ideas/themes.
Agreed. "Readers Digest Condensed Epicurean philosophy"
Don is there a greek word for "book" there in DL or does it give any hint that it might be a "list" rather than a "book"?
βιβλίων
... the Epicurus's principal doctrines, the noblest, as you know, of the books...
It goes on to say the book holds a summary of The Man's (Epicurus) wisdom of the beliefs (dogmata δόγματα,)
[PS. I know that's a really clunky quick-n-dirty translation btw. All the words are in order but...]