Posts by Eikadistes

Quote from Cassius

Nate from what is that a screen clip?

The most recent one is from a book written by Gilles Ménage identifying ancient female philosophers (I'm using those as placeholders to upload more documents I find as I go back-and-forth, editing). This is a particularly interesting case: the author identifies three female Epicurean philosophers by name: Lention (having authored literature and being widely attested), Themista (attested by many, many others), and Theophilia who is ONLY attested by Ménage (per that screenshot). I've been debating whether or not "Theophilia" is a corruption of "Demetria" or perhaps "Themista" (both names alluding to deities) or whether they are different individuals, altogether. As of now, I have to assume so. I have a number of questions about Theophilia, so that shot is just a reminder to keep investigating those questions.

Quote

"I have a great tenderness for [Heraclitus] and of the ancients I only prefer Aristotle more. The later philosopher – Epicurus (especially this one) [...] I've made an object of special study, but more out of [...] than philosophical interest" (Marx, Doctoral Thesis)

I've attached some documents that were helpful in identifying Epicureans.

EPICUREAN PHILOSOPHERS

[T]here are plenty of witnesses of the unsurpassable kindness of [Epicurus] to everybody; both his own country which honored him with brazen statues, and his friends who were so numerous that they could not be contained in whole cities; and all his acquaintances who were bound to him by nothing but the charms of his doctrine […] Also, the perpetual succession of his school, which, when every other school decayed, continued without any falling off, and produced a countless number of philosophers, succeeding one another without any interruption. (Diogenes Laërtius, The Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers, Book X)

387 BCE: Plato founds his Academy.

384 BCE: Aristotle is born in the Central Macedonian city of Stagira.

348 BCE: Plato dies at the age of 80 due to natural causes.

341 BCE: Epicurus is born on the Island of Samos.

338 BCE: Aristotle begins three years of teaching 13-year-old Alexander III of Macedon.

334 BCE: Aristotle founds his Lyceum at the age of 50.

327 BCE: A 14-year-old Epicurus is tutored by a Platonic philosopher named Pamphilus

326 BCE: Alexander III of Macedon invades India; 34-year old Pyrrho follows. As a result …

325 BCE: Pyrrho adopts the 200-year-old agnostic Indian school of Ajñāna and develops Skepticism

323 BCE: An 18-year-old Epicurus serves two years of required Athenian conscription

322 BCE: Aristotle dies at the age of 62 due to natural causes.

321 BCE: A 20-year-old Epicurus moves with family to Colophon and studies under the Peripatetic Praxiphanes; he later studies under Nausiphanes of Teos, a Democritean pupil of Pyrrho

316 BCE: A 25-year-old Epicurus observes Halley's Comet with Nausiphanes

311 BCE: A 30-year-old Epicurus begins teaching in Mytilene on the island of Lesbos

310 BCE: A 31-year-old Epicurus relocates Northward to Lampsacus on the mainland

309 BCE: A 32-year-old Epicurus directly witnesses a Total Solar Eclipse

306 BCE: A 35-year-old Epicurus moves to Athens and establishes the Garden

HEGEMON – HΓEMΩN – /hɛːɡe.'mɔːn/ – “Leader” of the Epicurean Community

Hegemon: EPICURUS* of SAMOS (c. 23-24th January 341 BCE – 270/69 BCE) founder of Epicureanism

KATHEGEMONES – KAΘHΓEMΩNHΣ – /ka.tʰɛːɡe.'mɔːniːz/ – “Guides” with the Hegemon

Kathegemon: POLYAENUS* of LAMPSACUS (c. 345 – 286 BCE)

Kathegemon: METRODORUS* of LAMPSACUS (c. 331/0 – 278/7 BCE)

Kathegemon: HERMARCHUS* of MYTILENE (c. 325 – 250 BCE)

*The founder and his closest three allies are called HOI ANDRES – OI ANΔPEΣ – "The Men"

DIADOCHOI – ΔIAΔOXOI – /diː'a.dɔːkʰoi̯/ – “Succession” of Epicurean Scholarchs

Scholarch (1st): HERMARCHUS* (c. 325 – 250 BCE) Scholarch from 270 to 250 BCE

Scholarch (2nd): POLYSTRATUS (c. 300 – 219/8 BCE) from 250 to 219/8 BCE

NOTE: Scholarchs after Polystratus will NOT have personally known Epicurus.

Scholarch (3rd): DIONYSIUS of LAMPTRAI (c. 280 – 205 BCE) from 219/8 to 205 BCE

Scholarch (4th): BASILIDES of TYRUS (c. 245 – 175 BCE) from 205 to 175 BCE

Scholarch (5th): PROTARCHUS of BARGHILIA (c. 225 – 150 BCE) from 175 to 150 BCE

Scholarch (6th): APOLLODORUS of ATHENS (c. 200 – 125 BCE) from 147 to 125 BCE

Scholarch (7th): ZENO of SIDON (c. 166 – 75 BCE) Scholarch from 125 to 75 BCE

Scholarch (8th): PHAEDRUS (c. 138 – 70/69 BCE) Scholarch from 75 to 70/69 BCE

Scholarch (9th): PATRO (c. 100 – 25 BCE) Scholarch from 70/69 to 51 BCE

In A.D. 121 the then incumbent, Popillius Theotimus, appealed to Plotina, widow of the emperor Trajan and a devoted adherent, to intercede with Hadrian for relief from a requirement that the head should be a Roman citizen, which had resulted in unfortunate choices. The petition was granted and acknowledged with all the gratitude that was proper to the sect. (De Witt, Epicurus and His Philosophy 332)

Scholarch (16ish): POPILLIUS THEOTIMUS (early 2nd-century CE)

Scholarch (17ish): HELIODORUS (2nd-century CE) Hadrian writes him.

"Later in the century it is on record that the school became a beneficiary of the bounty of Marcus Aurelius [161-180 CE], who bestowed a stipend of 10,000 drachmas per annum upon the heads of all the recognized schools" (De Witt, Epicurus and His Philosophy 332)

KATHEGETES – KAΘHΓHTEΣ – /ka.tʰɛːgɛː'tʰiːz/ – "Down from the Guides" or Teachers

Kathegete: ARISTOBULUS of SAMOS (4th – 3rd-century BCE) brother of Epicurus

Kathegete: CHAERDEMUS of SAMOS (4th – 3rd-century BCE) brother of Epicurus

Kathegete: NEOCLES of SAMOS (4th – 3rd-century BCE) another brother of Epicurus

GNORIMOI – ΓNΩPIMOI – /gnɔːriː'moi̯/ – "Known Familiars" or Disciples

APELLES (4th – 3rd-century BCE) the recipient of one of Epicurus' many epistles

APOLLODORUS of LAMPSACUS (4th – 3rd-century BCE ) the brother of Leonteus

BATIS of LAMPSACUS (4th – 3rd-century BCE) Idomeneus' wife and Metrodorus' sister

BOIDION (4th – 3rd-century BCE) "calf-eyes" hetaera who studied at the Garden

CALLISTRATUS (4th – 3rd-century BCE) fragmentary attestation

CARNEISCUS of LAMPSACUS (4th – 3rd-century BCE) dedicated a book on the death to Philainis

COLOTES of LAMPSACUS (c. 320 – 268 BCE) a popular Greek writer known for satire

CRONIUS of LAMPSACUS (4th – 3rd-century BCE) a former student of the Pythagorean Eudoxus

CTESSIPUS (4th – 3rd-century BCE) attested in a letter fragment written by Epicurus

DEMELATA (4th – 3rd-century BCE) attested by Philodemus

DEMETRIA (4th – 3rd-century BCE) a companion to Hermarchus

EROTION (4th – 3rd-century BCE) "lovely" hetaera who studied at the Garden

EUDEMUS (4th – 3rd-century BCE) mentioned in a letter written by Epicurus

HEDEIA (3rd-century BCE) "delectable" companion to Polyaenus

HIPPOCLIDES of LAMPSACUS (c. 300 – 219/8 BCE) born on the same day as Polystratus

IDOMENEUS of LAMPSACUS (c. 310 – 270 BCE) the main financier of the Garden

LEONTEUS of LAMPSACUS (4th – 3rd-century BCE) the husband of Themista

LEONTION (4th – 3rd-century BCE) "lioness", a respected writer and companion to Metrodorus

LYCOPHRON (4th – 3rd-century BCE) a correspondent of Leonteus of Lampsacus

MAMMARION (3rd-century BCE) "tits", a possible lover to Leonteus

MENESTRATUS (4th – 3rd-century BCE) pupil of Metrodorus

MENOECEUS of LAMPSACUS (4th – 3rd-century BCE) recipient of Epicurus' Letter to Menoeceus

MENTORIDES of LAMPSACUS (4th – 3rd-century BCE) the eldest brother of Metrodorus

MYS (4th – 3rd-century BCE) "mouse" a male slave granted his freedom who managed publishing

NICANOR (4th – 3rd-century BCE) student of Epicurus attested by Diogenes Laërtius

NIKIDION (4th – 3rd-century BCE "victress" possible lover to Idomeneus

PHILAINIS (4th – 3rd-century BCE) attested by Philodemus

PHILISTAS of LAMPSACUS (4th – 3rd-century BCE) inspired Carneiscus to write

PYTHOCLES of LAMPSACUS (c. 324 — 3rd-century BCE) recipient of Epicurus' Letter to Pythocles

THEMISTA of LAMPSACUS (4th – 3rd-century BCE) wife of Leonteus

THEOPHILIA (4th – 3rd-century BCE) attested by 1st-century Roman poet Martial

HELLENIC PHILOI – ΦIΛΩI – /'pʰi.loi̯/ – "Friends" or Associates

ANAXARCHUS (4th – 3rd-century BCE) fragmentary attestation

ARCHEPHON (4th – 3rd-century BCE) fragmentary attestation

CHARMIDES (4th – 3rd-century BCE) a friend of Arcesilaus the Academic Skeptic

DOSITHEUS (4th – 3rd-century BCE) the father of Hegesianax

ERASISTRATUS of CHIOS (c. 304 – 250 BCE) of the Alexandrian school of medicine

ZOPYRUS (4th – 3rd-century BCE) fragmentary attestation

ALEXANDRIA the ATOMIST (3rd-century BCE) associated with Alexandria

ANTIDORUS THE EPICUREAN (3rd-century BCE) who wrote a work against Heraclides

APOLLONIDES (3rd-century BCE) fragmentary attestation

APOLLODORUS the EPICUREAN (3rd-century BCE) a pupil of Polystratus

ARTEMON of LAODICEA (3rd-century BCE) one of several teachers of Philonides

AUTODORUS the EPICUREAN (3rd-century BCE) criticizes Heraclides in his treatise On Justice

CINEAS the EPICUREAN (3rd-century BCE) advised King Pyrrhus of Epirus (Plutarch)

DIODORUS (3rd-century BCE) fragmentary attestation

DIOTIMUS OF SEMACHIDES (3rd-century BCE) a pupil of Polystratus

EUGATHES (3rd-century BCE) fragmentary attestation

EUPHRONIUS (3rd-century BCE) ridiculed by Plutarch; possible contemporary of Aelian

HEGESIANAX (3rd-century BCE) son of Dositheus

HERMOCRATES (3rd-century BCE) who proposed natural explanation for prayer

PYRSON (3rd-century BCE) fragmentary attestation

THEOPHEIDES (3rd-century BCE) a friend of Hermarchus from whom he received a letter

ANTIPHANES (3rd – 2nd-century BCE) fragmentary attestation

ANTIOCHUS IV EPIPHANES (c. 3rd-century – 164 BCE) king and student to Philonides

ARISTONYMUS (3rd – 2nd-century BCE) a friend of Dionysius

DIOGENES of SELEUCIA (c. 3rd-century – 146 BCE) was put to death by Antiochus VI Dionysus

HELIODORUS OF ANTIOCH (3rd – 2nd-century BCE) a senior official in the court of Seleucus IV

ALCAEUS (2nd-century BCE) Sent and expelled from Rome with Philiscus in 154 BCE

CEPHISOPHON (2nd-century BCE) fragmentary attestation

DAMOPHANES (2nd-century BCE) fragmentary attestation

DEMETRIUS I SOTER (c. 185 – 150 BCE) a rule of the Seleucid Empire and student to Philonides

EUCRATIDES of RHODES (2nd-century BCE) was known only by his gravestone

HERACLITUS of RHODIAPOLIS (2nd-century BCE) Physician connected with the Athenian school

IOLAUS OF BITHYNIA (2nd-century BCE) a physician associated with Epicureanism

NICASICRATES of RHODES (2nd-century BCE) was called as a "dissident" by Philodemus

PHILISCUS (2nd-century BCE) Sent and expelled from Rome with Alcaeus in 154 BCE

PHILONIDES of LAODICEA (c. 200 – 130 BCE) Founded school in Antioch

THESPIS the EPICUREAN (2nd-century BCE) student of Scholarch Basilides; taught Philodemus

TIMASAGORAS of RHODES (2nd-century BCE) was called as a "dissident" by Philodemus

ATHENAEUS (2nd – 1st-century BCE) a pupil of Polyaenus of Lampsacus

ATHENAGORAS (2nd – 1st-century BCE) fragmentary attestation

ASCLEPIADES of BITHYNIA (124 – 40 BCE) Physician with atomic drug theory

IRENAEUS OF MILETUS (2nd – 1st-century BCE) a pupil of Demetrius Lacon

PHILODEMUS of GADARA (c. 110 – 30 BCE) manuscripts preserved in Herculaneum

ANTIGENES (1st-century BCE) friend of Philodemus

ANTIPATER (1st-century BCE) fragmentary attestation

APOLLOPHANES of PERGAMUM (1st-century BCE) sent to Rome to teach

BACCHUS (1st-century BCE) fragmentary attestation

BROMIUS (1st-century BCE) peer to Philodemus; Zeno of Sidon's pupil

DEMETRIUS LACON (1st-century BCE) Founded Milesian school; taught Philodemus

DIOGENES of TARSUS (1st-century BCE) travels with Plutiades of Tarsus

EGNATIUS (1st-century BCE) fragmentary attestation

LYSIAS of TARSUS (1st-century BCE) Tyrant of Tarsus who butchered the wealthy

ORION the EPICUREAN (1st-century BCE) Epicurean "notable" per Laërtius

PLATO OF SARDIS (1st-century BCE) fragmentary attestation

PLUTIADES of TARSUS (1st-century BCE) travels with Diogenes of Tarsus

PTOLEMEUS the BLACK of ALEXANDRIA (1st-century BCE) "notable" per Laërtius

PTOLEMEUS the WHITE of ALEXANDRIA (1st-century BCE) "notable" per Laërtius

TIMAGORAS (1st-century BCE) attested by Cicero

ARTEMIDORUS OF PARIUM (1st-century BCE/CE) fragmentary attestation

ATHENODORUS (1st-century CE) fragmentary attestation

ATHENODORUS OF ATHENS (1st-century CE) fragmentary attestation

AMYNIAS of SAMOS (1st-century CE) only known due to a stone inscription

BOETHUS OF SIDON (1st-century CE) an acquaintance of Plutarch

DIONYSIUS OF RHODES (1st-century CE) a friend of Diogenes of Oenoanda

MENNEAS (1st-century CE) fragmentary attestation

POLLIUS FELIX (1st-century CE) a patron of the poet Statius

THEODORIDAS OF LINDUS (1st-century CE) an acquaintance of Diogenes of Oenoanda

XENOCLES OF DELPHI (1st-century CE) an acquaintance of Plutarch

XENOCRITOS (1st-century CE) known only from a stone inscription

EPICURIUS (1st – 2nd-century CE) a philosopher attested by the Middle Platonist Plutarch

CELSUS [1] the EPICUREAN (2nd-century CE) a friend of Lucian of Samosata

CELSUS [2] the EPICUREAN (2nd-century CE) a Greek opponent to the Christian church

DIOCLES the EPICUREAN (2nd-century CE) a Greek opponent to the Christian church

DIOGENES of OENOANDA (2nd-century CE) posted Epicurean teachings on a 205-ft. wall

DIOGENIANUS (2nd-century CE) who wrote a polemic against Chrysippus

HERACLITUS of RHODIAPOLIS (2nd-century CE) known from a stone inscription

LUCIAN OF SAMOSATA (c. 125 – 180 CE) a Syrian satirist who ridiculed the supernatural

NICERATUS of RHODES (2nd-century CE) a close friend of Diogenes of Oenoanda

PHILIDAS HERACLEONOS of DIDYMA (2nd-century CE) known from a stone inscription

ZENOCRATES THE EPICUREAN (2nd – 3rd-century CE) a hedonist from Alciphron's letters

EXUPERANTIA (3rd – 4th-century CE) the wife of Heraclamon Leonides

HERACLAMON LEONIDES (3rd – 4th-century CE) the husband of Exuperantia

ROMAN AMICI – AMICI – /a'miːkiː / – "Friends" or "Associates"

ANTONIUS (2nd-century BCE) Exchanged views with Galen on medical matters.

GAIUS AMAFINIUS (late 2nd-century BCE) among the first Epicureans to write in Latin

RABIRIUS (late 2nd-century BCE) among the first Epicureans to write in Latin

TITUS ALBUCIUS (late 2nd-century BCE) studied in Athens; passed teachings to Rome

AULUS TORQUATUS (2nd – 1st-century BCE) a relative of L. Manlius and possible Epicurean

CATIUS INSUBER (c. 2nd-century – 45 BCE) popular Celtic author from Northern Italy

LUCIUS CORNELIUS SISENNA (2nd – 1st-century BCE) a historian and “inconsistent” Epicurean

LUCIUS MANLIUS TORQUATUS (2nd-century – 46 BCE) a friend of Cicero; AGAINST Julius Caesar

NERO THE EPICUREAN (2nd – 1st-century BCE) fragmentary attestation

TITUS POMPONIUS ATTICUS (110 – 32 BCE) Close friend of Cicero; wisely apolitical

ANTHIS (1st-century BCE) a freedwoman of Calpurnia Caesaris who named her son “Mr. 20th”

AURELIUS OPILIUS (1st-century BCE) Freedman who retired to Mytilene

DION (1st-century BCE) A philosopher for whom Cicero had no regard and little respect

LUCIUS AUFIDIUS BASSUS (1st-century BCE) Used philosophy to deal with a chronic illness

LUCIUS CORNELIUS BALBUS (1st-century BCE) a friend of Cicero

LUCIUS LUCCESIUS (1st-century BCE) a friend of Cicero

LUCIUS PAPIRIUS PAETUS (1st-century BCE) good friends with Cicero

LUCIUS SAUFEIUS (1st-century BCE) Friend of Cicero and Atticus; seemingly apolitical

LUCIUS VARIUS RUFUS (1st-century BCE) Roman poet and associate of Virgil

MARCUS FADIUS GALLUS (1st-century BCE) a friend of Cicero who wrote against Julius Caesar

MARCUS POMPILIUS ANDRONICUS (1st-century BCE) correspondent with Cicero

MARCUS VALERIUS MESSALLA CORVINUS (1st-century BCE) a friend of Horace

MARIUS the EPICUREAN (1st-century BCE) a friend of Cicero and subject of a text

MATIUS the EPICUREAN (1st-century BCE) a friend of Cicero known for defying anti-Caesarists

PLAUTIUS TUCCA (1st-century BCE) Roman poet and associate of Virgil

PUBLIUS CORNELIUS DOLABELLA (1st-century BCE) Senate declared him an “enemy of the State”

PUBLIUS VOLUMNIUS ETRAPELUS (1st-century BCE) fragmentary attestation

SIRO (1st-century BCE) Pupil of Zeno of Sidon; taught Virgil; founded the school in Naples

STATILIUS the EPICUREAN (1st-century BCE) a friend of Cicero who argued against Civil War

TREBIANUS (1st-century BCE) fragmentary attestation

VELLEIUS the EPICUREAN (1st-century BCE) a friend of Cicero who supported Epicurean theology

LUCIUS CALPURNIUS PISO CAESONINUS (c. 100 – 43 BCE) friend of Cicero; Caesar's father-in-law

TITUS LUCRETIUS CARUS (99 – 55 BCE) writes De Rerum Natura

GAIUS VIBIUS PANSA CAETRONIANUS (c. 90s – 43 BCE) Friend of Cicero; Friend of Julius Caesar

AULUS HIRTIUS (c. 90 – 43 BCE) a friend of Cicero and former lobbyist against Caesar

GAIUS CASSIUS LONGINUS (86 – 42 BCE) a friend of Cicero and conspirator against Caesar

CAIUS TREBATIUS TESTA (84 BCE – 4 CE) a friend of Cicero who supported Julius Caesar

CALPURNIA CAESARIS (c. 75 BCE – 00s BCE) Daughter of Piso

PUBLIUS VIRGILIUS MARO (70 – 19 BCE) student of Siro at the Garden of Naples

GAIUS CILNIUS MAECENAS (70 – 8 BCE) political advisor to Octavian/Augustus

QUINTUS HORACE HORATIUS FLACCUS (65 – 8 BCE) Coined carpe diem or "seize the day!"

CAIUS STALLIUS HAURANUS (1st-century BCE – 1st-century CE) a student in Naples

LUCIUS CALPURNIUS PISO PONTIFEX (48 BCE – 32 CE) the son of Piso Caesoninus

PUBLIUS QUINTILIUS VARUS (46 BCE – 9 CE) a general and fellow-student of Virgil

ALEXANDER the EPICUREAN (1st-century CE) who was "fond of learning"

DIODORUS the EPICUREAN (1st-century CE) who allegedly committed suicide

GAIUS PETRONIUS ARBITER (c. 27 – 66 CE) who allegedly committed suicide

MARCUS GAVIUS APICIUS (1st-century CE) a gourmet during Tiberius' reign

NOMENTANUS (1st-century CE) a Roman Epicurean during Tiberius' reign

PUBLIUS MANLIUS VOPISCUS (1st-century CE) a patron of the poet Statius

CAIUS ARTORIUS CELER (1st – 2nd-century CE) a philosopher from North Africa

EMPRESS POMPEIA PLOTINA CLAUDIA PHOEBE PISO (c. 68 – 121/2 CE) Trajan's widow

MAXIMUS THE EPICUREAN (1st – 2nd-century CE) fragmentary attestation

AURELIUS BELIUS PHILIPPUS (2nd-century CE) Head of Apamean school

DAMIS THE EPICUREAN (2nd-century CE) whose historical personage is poorly attested

PUDENTIANUS (2nd-century CE) Galen wrote a lost work to him

TIBERIUS CLAUDIUS LEPIDUS (2nd-century CE) Founded school in Amastris

EMPEROR LUCIUS SEPTIMIUS SEVERUS (145 – 211) Emperor from 193 to 211

ZENOBIUS (2nd – 3rd-century CE) the target of a book by Alexander of Aphrodisias

PALLADAS of ALEXANDRIA (4th-century CE) known as the “last known ancient Epicurean”

We have seen that at the beginning of the third century AD, some five centuries after the death of its founder, Epicureanism was still alive both in major centres and in remoter parts of the Graeco-Roman world. It is generally held, however, that its demise lay not far off, that by the middle of the fourth century it would have become a virtually forgotten creed, overwhelmed, along with Stoicism, by the spread of Christianity, fully justifying St. Augustine's boast that 'its ashes are so cold that not a single spark can be struck from them'. (Jones, Epicurean Tradition 94)

MEDIEVAL EPICUREANS:

FREDERICK II, HOLY ROMAN EMPEROR (1194 – 1250) who burns in Dante's Inferno

FARINATA DEGLI UBERTI (1212 – 1264) a Florentine atheist who burns in Dante's Inferno

CAVALCANTE DE' CAVALCANTI (c. 1230 – 1280) a philosopher who burns in Dante's Inferno

MANFRED, KING OF SICILY (1232 – 1266) the son of Frederick II and fellow Epicurean

GUIDO CAVALCANTI (c. 1250 – 1300) best friend of Dante and son of Cavalcante

MODERN EPICUREANS AND NEO-EPICUREANS:

LORENZO VALLA (1406 – 1457) who wrote On Pleasure and sympathized with Epicurus

ERASMUS OF ROTTERDAM (1466 – 1536) a Dutch philosopher and Humanist

LUDOVICO ARIOSTO (1474 – 1533) a poet who employed Epicurean themes

GIOVANNI DI LORENZO DE' MEDICI, POPE LEO X (1475 – 1521) a luxury-loving Humanist

FRANCESCO GUICCIARDINI (1483 – 1540) of the Italian Renaissance

MICHEL EYQUEM DE MONTAIGNE (1533 – 1592) of the French Renaissance

ELIO DIODATAI (1576 – 1661) a Genevan jurist and supporter of Galileo

FRANÇOIS DE LA MOTHE LE VAYER (1588 – 1672) a writer and friend of Moliére

THÉOPHILE DE VIAU (1590 – 1626) who was banished from France on charges of immorality

PIERRE GASSENDI (1592 – 1655) who tried to reconcile Epicureanism with Christianity

JACQUES VALLÉE, SIEUR DES BARREAUX (1599 – 1673) a French poet and lover of de Viau

FRANÇOIS LUILLIER (1600 – 1651) was known by reputation as a practicing Epicurean

GABRIEL NAUDÉ (1600 – 1653) a French librarian, prolific writer, and friend of Gassendi

GUILLES DE LAUNAY (c. 1600– 1675) wrote that Epicurus was the ideal natural philosopher

GUI PATIN (1601 – 1672) a French doctor and great friend of Gabriel Naudé

EMMANUEL MAIGNAN (1601 – 1676) a French physicist and Christian Epicurean theologian

JEAN FRANÇOIS SARASIN (1611 – 1654) a French writer and Epicurean devotee

MARION DE LORME (1613 – 1650) a famous French courtesan from a known Epicurean circle

CHARLES DE SAINT-ÉVREMOND (1613 – 1703) a follower of Gassendi

FRANÇOIS VI, DUC DE LA ROCHEFOUCAULD (1613 – 1680) a French author

ANTOINE MENJOT (c. 1615 – 1696) a French doctor and follower of Gassendi

WALTER CHARLETON (1619 – 1707) a main transmitter of Epicureanism to England

SAVINIEN DE CYRANO DE BERGERAC (1619 – 1655) a French novelist and playwright

FRANÇOIS BERNIER (1620 – 1688) a French physician and follower of Gassendi

NINON DE L'ENCLOS (1620 – 1705) an author who left her inheritance for 9-year-old Voltaire

JEAN DE LA FONTAINE (1621 – 1695) a widely-read French poet and fabulist

MARGARET CAVENDISH, DUCHESS (1623 – 1673) an atomist but not a classical Epicurean

MADAME MARIE DE RABUTIN-CHANTAL, MARQUISE DE SÉVIGNÉ (1626 – 1696) an aristocrat

SIR WILLIAM TEMPLE, 1st BARONET (1628 – 1699) an essayist and friend of Wilmot

ANTOINETTE DESHOULIÈRES (1634 – 1655) a French, epicurean poet

GUILLAUME AMFRYE DE CHAULIEU (1639 – 1720) a convinced Epicurean poet

APHRA BEHN (1640 – 1689) an English playwright, poet, writer, and libertine translator

GUILLAUME LAMY (1644 – 1683) a French physician who taught La Mettrie

CHARLES AUGUSTE DE LA FARE (1644 – 1712) a French poet and friend of Chaulieu

JACQUES PARRAIN DES COUTURES (1645 – 1702) who wrote La Morale d'Epicure

JOHN WILMOT, 2nd EARL of ROCHESTER (1647 – 1680) a satirist; friend of Temple

JEAN DE LA CHAPELLE (1651 – 1723) the “father of French epicurean poetry.”

FRANÇOIS COURTIN (1659 – 1739) abbot of Mont-Saint-Quentin by age nineteen

WILLIAM CONGREVE (1670 – 1729) an English playwright of the Restoration Period

BERNARD MANDEVILLE (1670 – 1733) an Anglo-Dutch philosopher, economist, and satirist

CELESTINO GALIANI (1681 – 1753) an Archbishop who adhered to “Christian Epicureanism”

JULIEN OFFRAY DE LA METTRIE (1709 – 1751) who grounded mental processes in the body

FREDERICK II of PRUSSIA (1712 – 1786) also known as “Frederick The Great”

DENIS DIDEROT (1713 – 1784) a French author, social critic, and religious skeptic

CLAUDE ADRIEN HELVÉTIUS (1715 – 1771) a French utilitarian philosopher

PAUL-HENRI THIRY, BARON D'HOLBACH (1723 – 1789) an atheist during the Enlightenment

THOMAS JEFFERSON (1743 – 1826) the third President of the United States of America

JEREMY BENTHAM (1748 – 1832) an English philosopher and founder of modern Utilitarianism

RICHARD PAYNE KNIGHT (1751 – 1824) an English classical scholar and collector

WILLIAM SHORT (1759 – 1849) an ambassador and friend of Thomas Jefferson

WALTER SAVAGE LANDOR (1775 – 1864) an English writer, poet, and activist

CHARLES GREVILLE (1794 – 1865) an English diarist and amateur cricket player

FRANCIS WRIGHT (1795 – 1852) a Scottish-American writer, feminist, and abolitionist

WALT WHITMAN (1819 – 1892) and American poet whose Father heard Wright lecture

WILLIAM WALLACE (1844 – 1897) a Scottish philosopher inspired by Epicurus

ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON (1850 – 1894) an American writer and author of Treasure Island

JEAN-MARIE GUYAU (1854 – 1888) a French author and anarchist who died at the age of 33

HENRY DWIGHT SEDGWICK (1861 – 1957) titled his auto-biography Memoirs of an Epicurean

CHARLES LEOPOLD MAYER (1881 – 1971) a French biochemist and Liberal who opposed Marx

JUN TSUJI (1884 – 1944) a Japanese dadaist, absurdist, poet, essayist and playwright

H. P. LOVECRAFT (1890 – 1927) whose philosophy of Cosmicism was inspired by Epicureanism
JOSÉ MUJICA (1935 – PRESENT) a farmer and 40^th President of Uruguay from 2010 to 2015.

CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS (1949 – 2011) a writer, polemicist and religious critic

CASSIUS AMICUS (1958 – PRESENT) a writer and proprietor of NewEpicurean.com

MICHEL ONFRAY (1959 – PRESENT) a scholar of hedonism and fierce religious critic

HIRAM CRESPO (1975 – PRESENT) a writer and founder of SocietyOfEpicurus.com

NATHAN H. BARTMAN (1988 – PRESENT) a musician and author of this historical investigation.

FORMER EPICUREANS:

TIMOCRATES of LAMPSACUS (4th – 3rd-century BCE) brother of Metrodorus of Lampsacus

HERODOTUS of LAMPSACUS (4th – 3rd-century BCE) Friend of Timocrates

METRODORUS of STRATONECIUS (2nd-century BCE) converted to Academic Skepticism

CICERO (106 BCE – 43 BCE) Student of Phaedrus who pioneered Eclecticism

SAUL of TARSUS (c. 5 – 65 CE) Better known as St. Paul the Apostle of the Christian tradition

EPICUREAN COMMUNITIES:

We meet Epicureans not just in Athens, where they were amongst Paul's audiences, but we also come across Epicurean communities in the West, in Herculaneum or Sorrento, in the East, on Rhodes and Cos, in Pergamon, Lycian Oinoanda, Syrian Apameia, in remote southern Lycian Rhodiapolis or in Amastris in Bithynia on the Black Sea. (The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism 48)

School at LAMPSACUS (modern Northwestern Turkey) Founded by Epicurus

The GARDEN (O KHΠOΣ) of ATHENS (Central Greece) Founded by Epicurus

Community in CORINTH (Peloponnese peninsula, Greece)

Community in CHALCIS (Euboea island, Greece)

Community in THEBES (Boeotia, Central Greece)

Community in THESSALONIKI (Macedonia region, Greece)

Community in KOS (Southeastern island of Greece)

School at RHODES (Southeastern island of Greece)

School at AMASTRIS (Northern Turkey) Founded by Tiberius Claudius Lepidus

Community in TARSUS (Northwest Turkey)

Community in PERGAMON (Western Turkey)

Community in COLOPHON (Western Turkey)

Community in EPHESUS (Southwestern Turkey)

School at MILETUS (Southwestern Turkey) Founded by Demetrius Laco

Community in OINOANDA (Southwestern Turkey) Supported by Diogenes

Community in RHODIAPOLIS (Southwestern Turkey)

School at ANTIOCH (South-central Turkey) Founded by Philonides

School at APAMEIA (Western Syria) Lead by Aurelius Belius Philippus

Community at SIDON (Lebanon)

Community at TYRE (Lebanon)

Community in ALEXANDRIA (City of Alexander III of Macedon in Egypt)

Community in OXYRHYNCHUS (Southern Egypt)

School at NAPLES (Southwestern Italy) Founded by Siro

Community in HERCULANEUM (Southwestern Italy) Lead by Philodemus

Community in ROME (Western Italy) Inspired by Albucius

Perfect! Thank you, I have a few more to add.

Cassius I was about to upload more when I received a storage limit error. The files, themselves, are small, and I deleted some duplicate images to save storage space. Is there a Trash Can somewhere that needs to be emptied?

Thanks, Cassius!

That meme in particular made me laugh because I needed an egregiously pro-Stoic headline for comedic juxtaposition and I thought it was fitting that Donald Robertson not only wrote this, but published it within the last few months.

It was only after capturing it that I realized he wrote it. I can always count on Donald for new material.

My username is Shazdar#7526 for anyone else using the platform.

There's an interesting idea called the Romulus and Remus Hypothesis which suggests that modern human language could only have been developed by children: "pre-modern humans would not have been able to learn recursive language as adults, and, therefore, would not be able to teach recursive language to their own children." The author suggests that humans have a brief window to develop the ability to convey spatial relations through speech (i.e. prepositions), so ... two kids 70 millennia ago made the first joke and ... here we are.

https://phys.org/news/2019-08-r…usly-years.html

Quote from Don

Just FYI: Modern brain research has debunked the 3-part human brain. All mammalian brains (and possibly others, sorry, can't recall off the top of my head .... pun not necessarily intended) contain all those parts to varying degrees. See the work of Dr. Barrett and others.

https://how-emotions-are-made.com/notes/Triune_brain_myth

https://drsarahmckay.com/rethinking-the-reptilian-brain/

https://thebrainscientist.com/2018/04/11/you…a-lizard-brain/

The 3-part human brain schema always struck me as being Platonic (and Freudian, for that matter)

1. the rational superego of the "human" logos (λογιστικόν), or logistikon
2. the selfish ego of the "mammalian" thymos (θυμοειδές), or thumoeides
3. the defensive id of the "reptilian" eros (ἐπιθυμητικόν), or epithumetikon

There seems to be a correlation between the three gunas (psychological qualities) posited in the Gita:

1. Sattva (सत्त्व), being understanding, patient, orderly, and wise
2. Rajas (रजस्), being ambitious, passionate, and egotistical
3. Tamas (तमस्), being vindictive, defensive, violence, and destructive

I'm curious if there is a historical link between the aforementioned division of Threes. I note a division of Fours that can be found throughout history from Hippocrates' four humors to Galen's four personalities, to the four stations of life in Hinduism and the Indian caste system that reflects it, to contemporary American job-placement tests: there is a direct, historical evolution there. There may be for Threes, too.

I believe that Discord servers can only be accessed through invitation.

(I sent you a request on Discord).

There's a wonderful series of facial reconstructions of ancient Greek personalities on the following website: https://www.greecehighdefinition.com/blog/2020/11/1…and-politicians. While Epicurus is not featured among them, I located an artist's reconstruction of our favorite philosopher elsewhere on the internet:

Recently, I've come to think of this like the weather forecast:

Is a "good day" a day that isn't rainy? Or is a "good day" a day that is positively sunny?

... and what's the difference, anyway?

Is Partly Cloudy not also Partly Sunny?

Similarly, does not the absence of pain and suffering indicate the presence of pleasure? I think it must.

There's definitely a danger of mistaking "ethical egoism" or "ethical hedonism" as being quiescent and withdrawn due to the implication that anything defined as "ethical" is necessarily reminiscent of a meditating Buddha, or a passive guru, or a stoic priest. I think this is what leads people to automatically assume that Epicurus wanted "painlessness" rather than "pleasure-fulness", or why he'd prefer "a sky without clouds" rather than a "sunny day". Not because there is any physical difference, but because they are afraid of embracing pleasure, and use the first one as a euphemism for what's really going on.

Throughout history, there's a trend – though, not absolute – for neo-Ideologies to actually be syntheses between ancient systems and contemporary counterparts. We often observe neo-Ideologies when an apologist attempts to demonstrate coherence between an older, heterodox tradition, and a dominant, modern orthodoxy, despite their apparent contradictions.

With this in mind, the question becomes, "Can Epicurean philosophy incorporate innovations – which can be demonstrated to be 'coherent' with Epicurus' teaching – and still be considered 'classically Epicurean'?"

Let's look at the practice of Vipassanā meditation. A number of studies seem to demonstrate that this specific form of meditation will reliably reduce emotional disturbance, and remove psychological barriers that keep people from improving their circumstances. The practice, itself, seems to be coherent with Epicurean materialism. On top of that, even when we look at the Eastern philosophy behind the practice, we see more nuance: the Abhidarma text from the Therevāda tradition of Buddhism makes a defense of atomism: "An atom (paramänu) is the smallest rüpa (form). It cannot be cut, broken, penetrated; it cannot be taken up, abandoned, ridden on, stepped on, struck or dragged. It is neither long nor short, square nor round, regular nor irregular, convex nor concave. It has no smaller parts; it cannot be decomposed, cannot be seen, heard, smelled, touched. It is thus that the paramänu is said to be the finest of all rüpas". While the practice of meditation is deeply rooted in Buddhism, the physical practice, itself, has psychiatric utility by using natural tools. So there is coherence between large parts of the philosophies. This suggests that an adoption of some "Buddhist" practices can still be Epicurean, in the same way that the reverence of The Buddha has been adopted as an acceptable practice for orthodox Hindus to adopt (as long as The Buddha is seen as an inferior avatar to the Supreme Brahman).

Now, that was an example of a religious tradition that provides some level of coherence with Epicurean philosophy; let's consider an example, of a non-ideological, scientific discipline that conceptually agrees with Epicurean philosophy, but arrives at incompatible conclusions. While Epicurus appropriately grounded celestial phenomena in physics (as does contemporary meteorology and astronomy), he made a number of errors in his conclusions. Even though he acknowledged the limitations of the 4th-century, a number of his guesses were notedly inaccurate. If we held contemporary scientific disciplines to the same rigor as we would ideologies, should we not consider Epicureans who accept contemporary meteorology and astronomy to be, necessarily "neo-Epicureans"? I think we'd agree that that is unreasonable, since everyone since, at least, the Enlightenment would not qualify as a "Classical Epicurean".

That being said, the category of "neo-Epicurean" is still relevant, and important. So, I think that would be defined as any philosophy whose original tenets are in overwhelming contradiction with the doctrines of Epicurus. Thus, one of the two philosophies would have to be altered to gain coherence with the other. An example may be a Thomist Christian who claims to be "Epicurean", and revere Epicurus due to his exploration of the material world, while being rather mistaken in the larger picture of Epicurean philosophy (and failing to recognize his Peripatetic influence). This (hypothetical) attempted synthesis between Christianity and Epicurean philosophy would be an example of "neo-Epicureanism". Similar (to reference a recent project), a synthesis between "Dudeism" and Epicurean philosophy would, with these parameters in mind, qualify as "neo-Epicureanism". Dudeism is compatible with Agnosticism, Taoism, and Zen Buddhism, each of which conflict with Epicurean teachings ... at the same time, Dudeism also conflicts with some of its inspirations in its promotion of a hedonist ethics. So, we have ethical and ontological coherence, but the epistemology and aesthetics differ. These are pretty irreconcilable differences, so I'd say this would be "neo-Epicureanism", and, while I'm thinking about it, I think this is the fundamental, distinguishing variable: "Are the differences fundamentally irreconcilable"?

A minor example, which I see as being coherent with Epicurus' doctrines, thus, being "Classically Epicurean", would be Thomas Jefferson. If we hold him to the same rigor, he should be considered a "neo-Epicurean", since he clearly invokes the mythology of the "Creator" in numerous documents (which is at utter odds with the Epicurean notion of an eternal universe). But if Thomas Jefferson cannot be considered a "Classical Epicurean", then who, after the 2nd or 3rd-centuries CE can? If we can accept Jefferson as an authentic Epicurean, even though his deism hints at a finite universe, then couldn't we just as easily accept movements like Secular Humanism as well as mock religions like Satanism and Pastafarianism? For that matter, there's a lot of coherence between the ethics and physics of atheists and agnostics despite their being theological differences. Specifically, the issue of theology seems to be minor to most of us – I think a tremendous amount of this group identify as "atheists", even though this is a direct contradiction with Epicurean orthodoxy.

So the question is: "Where do we draw the line"? Can atheists be "Epicurean"? Or are atheists, necessarily "neo-Epicurean"? What about atomists and hedonists who practice Hatha Yoga, or Vipassanā meditation? Are they "Epicurean" or "neo-Epicurean"? How about most of us since Newton who correctly understand that people can simultaneously live on both sides of the planet due to our modern understanding of gravity? Are we all "neo-Epicurean" because we have synthesized Newtonian physics with Epicurus' incomplete physics of "the downward force"? I'm positive that Epicurus would accept most of the conclusions contemporary physics, and would adopt its methods and findings. Perhaps the data from the Hubble telescope that suggests universal expansion would force him to re-consider the "eternal" quality of particles (which seem to not have existed while the early universe was too hot). Given that, a good question is this: should anyone who accepts "the Big Bang" and the Principle Doctrines be considered a "neo-Epicurean" due to their acceptance of a finite cosmos that once lacked particles?

I'm not sure. I think that will be subjective between individuals. I think that foreign practices can be coherent with Epicurean philosophy, regardless of the ideological demands of their foreign, source material. We can adopt the practice of Hatha Yoga without adopting Pantajali's metaphysical dualism. We can adopt Vipassanā meditation without accepting the emptiness of Buddhist ethics. In the scientific realm, I think we can accept the observations of the Hubble telescope that challenge the eternal cosmos without in any way being considered to be "neo-Epicurean". I think that "neo-Epicureans" would have to be individuals who claim to identify with another tradition, yet see Epicurus as a major influence. In this sense, we might see Dudeism as a form of "neo-Epicureanism", or, for that matter, even some Mormons who admire Epicurus (if there are any), due to their multi-world, material cosmology.

But there will always be disagreements. The Church of the East, the Orthodox Church, the Roman Catholic Church, and Evangelical movements all claims to be the most authentic manifestation of Christianity. Sunni and Shi'a Muslims claim the same thing – and positively love fighting about it. Surely, some Epicureans will identify as atheists, whereas some might be agnostic; I argue that as long as they are hedonists who accept an epistemology of the senses, an ethics of pleasure, and a physics of atoms, they are fundamentally Epicurean, even if they have minor disagreements in the conclusions of Epicurus; as long as the methodology and doctrines are coherent, its still "Classical Epicureanism"; whereas Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, Toaists (etc.) who admire Epicurus, and attempt to incorporate his easy-going nature and his suspicion of being manipulated, but reject atomism or hedonism, are "neo-Epicureans".

Or is that Sindarin? (I think it's actually Sindarin).

ANYWAY, it's been a while since I reviewed the grammar and syntax of Quenya.

Tolkien's Catholicism always interested me! He provided an interesting translation of the Lord's Prayer in Quenya:

You remembered perfectly, Eugenious!

May I add:

Or ilyë lëor nort' Anar ar Eleni tennoio marir;

Úvan equë Aure ná carna, var mer' Eleni namárië.

Above all shadows rides the Sun and Stars forever dwell;

I will not say the Day is done, nor bid the Stars farewell.”

(I have the Sindarin translation of this poem tattooed on my chest:)

Or 'waith bain nôr Anor a Giliath an-ui dorthar;

Ú-bedithon iGalan garnen, egor aníro iñGîl no-vaer.

YAAAS! Another Tolkien fan!