Recent Activities
Regularly Checking In On A Small Screen Device? Bookmark THIS page!
-
Cassius
Reaction (Post)June 23, 2025 at 7:44 AM You can't have Venus without Mars. Old things must be destroyed, must die, for new things to be created. Otherwise, nothing would change; everything would be static. -
Don
PostJune 23, 2025 at 7:08 AM You can't have Venus without Mars. Old things must be destroyed, must die, for new things to be created. Otherwise, nothing would change; everything would be static. -
Cassius
PostJune 23, 2025 at 6:41 AM […]
As to Mars, that's the type of conclusion I am questioning. The tendency now is to see Mars as wholly negative, whereas it does not appear that he was viewed in such a wholly negative way in Greco-Roman mythology. Are these conclusions about Mars what… -
Cassius
Reaction (Post)June 23, 2025 at 6:29 AM Summary of the above:- Lucretius poetically adopted for his own poem the Empedoclean struggle between the moral forces of Love and Strife [wikipedia]
- However, in an atomistic understanding of Nature these forces are not moral. Through an endless process of
- Lucretius poetically adopted for his own poem the Empedoclean struggle between the moral forces of Love and Strife [wikipedia]
-
Joshua
June 23, 2025 at 1:26 AM Reacted withReaction (Post)to Godfrey’s post in the thread The Religion of Nature - as supported by Lucretius' De Rerum Natura.
This comes to mind from Lucretius book V: 1198-1203 ish:
It is no piety to show oneself
Bowing with veiled head towards a stone,
Nor to be seen frequenting every altar,
Nor to fall prostrate on the ground, with palms outspread 1200
Before the shrines of… -
Godfrey
June 23, 2025 at 12:36 AM Replied to the thread The Religion of Nature - as supported by Lucretius' De Rerum Natura.PostThis comes to mind from Lucretius book V: 1198-1203 ish:
It is no piety to show oneself
Bowing with veiled head towards a stone,
Nor to be seen frequenting every altar,
Nor to fall prostrate on the ground, with palms outspread 1200
Before the shrines of… -
Don
Reaction (Post)June 22, 2025 at 9:52 PM Summary of the above:- Lucretius poetically adopted for his own poem the Empedoclean struggle between the moral forces of Love and Strife [wikipedia]
- However, in an atomistic understanding of Nature these forces are not moral. Through an endless process of
- Lucretius poetically adopted for his own poem the Empedoclean struggle between the moral forces of Love and Strife [wikipedia]
-
Joshua
PostJune 22, 2025 at 9:30 PM Summary of the above:- Lucretius poetically adopted for his own poem the Empedoclean struggle between the moral forces of Love and Strife [wikipedia]
- However, in an atomistic understanding of Nature these forces are not moral. Through an endless process of
- Lucretius poetically adopted for his own poem the Empedoclean struggle between the moral forces of Love and Strife [wikipedia]
-
Randall Moose
June 22, 2025 at 9:23 PM Reacted withReaction (Post)to Kalosyni’s post in the thread The Religion of Nature - as supported by Lucretius' De Rerum Natura.
Perhaps it ought to be phrased: "The Spirituality of Nature" rather than "religion" (because I am taking notice of what Lucretius wrote at the start of Book 4 in Derum Natura regarding "religion").
One would guess that back in time people where much more… -
Cassius
Reaction (Post)June 22, 2025 at 8:55 PM George Santayana discusses this question in his essay on Lucretius from Three Philosophical Poets;
[…]
And Stephen Greenblatt in The Swerve argues a similar case;
[…] -
Joshua
PostJune 22, 2025 at 8:50 PM George Santayana discusses this question in his essay on Lucretius from Three Philosophical Poets;
[…]
And Stephen Greenblatt in The Swerve argues a similar case;
[…] -
Kalosyni
Reaction (Post)June 22, 2025 at 7:22 PM It was a pleasure to put faces to names for those I hadn't met yet, and always good to see those with whom I have had conversations in the past. -
Cassius
ThreadJune 22, 2025 at 5:46 PM In regard to the opening of Lucretius referring to interaction between Mars and Venus, I know personally that I've always associated the allusion to mean something like "Venus - good / Mars - bad." However I now see that the original Greek mythology… -
Rolf
Reaction (Post)June 22, 2025 at 4:21 PM It was a pleasure to put faces to names for those I hadn't met yet, and always good to see those with whom I have had conversations in the past. -
Cassius
Reaction (Post)June 22, 2025 at 4:14 PM It was a pleasure to put faces to names for those I hadn't met yet, and always good to see those with whom I have had conversations in the past. -
Don
June 22, 2025 at 4:00 PM Replied to the thread Sunday June 22 - Topic: Prolepsis.PostIt was a pleasure to put faces to names for those I hadn't met yet, and always good to see those with whom I have had conversations in the past. -
Don
Reaction (Post)June 22, 2025 at 3:59 PM Thanks for today everyone! Your perspectives were very helpful. Don, Bryan: It was great to finally meet you “in-person”.
I’m interested in hearing more about the epicurean perspective(s) on gods. Are there any recommended podcast episodes on this topic? -
Rolf
Reaction (Post)June 22, 2025 at 2:44 PM Rolf I am pretty sure this is the one where Don appeared with us:
Episode 256 - Epicurean Gods: Real, Or Ideal Thought Constructs? there's also the full series of episodes on Cicero's "On The Nature of The Gods" that begins with episode 226:
Episode 226… -
Cassius
June 22, 2025 at 2:21 PM Replied to the thread Sunday June 22 - Topic: Prolepsis.PostRolf I am pretty sure this is the one where Don appeared with us:
Episode 256 - Epicurean Gods: Real, Or Ideal Thought Constructs? there's also the full series of episodes on Cicero's "On The Nature of The Gods" that begins with episode 226:
Episode 226…