Something you don't think of. There were people that got out of Pompeii and Herculaneum. The abundance of corpses gives you the impression that everybody was killed, but there is evidence that many, if not most got out fast when the eruption started.
Enjoy! 
Hi there!
A Butlerian Jihad would be pretty violent and involved. It would depend on what kind of menace the thinking machines presented. If it was the case that they would destroy the human race, the future Epicureans included naturally, I see them joining the fight. It's impossible to guess, though, what future people will do. (Just look at recent polling). 
It would all be in their laps, and how they see their own pleasure-pain calculus.
I have adapted well to some text based A.I. tools but using it for images, audio and video, and most robotic applications is still deeply disturbing to me.
You'd be surprised how fast AI grows on you. Chat people on the forum here will vouch that I am a dedicated user of Alexa! 
Heck, I just used her services to spell "calculus" correctly!
The future has arrived! 🤖 (And departed).
Radio Station's Attempt to Replace Hosts With AI Ends in Absolute Disaster
"Nothing comes from nothing" = there are causes for what exists and there are conditions (natural laws) that everything is conditioned and governed by...cows don't pop out of thin air, because they depend on causes and conditions of the material world of matter.
They'd have to be quantum cows to do that! Good point!
I would push back against the idea of "popping in and out of existence"..... Changing from one *form* to another however is certainly plausible, like ice to water. But the word *existence* is probably exactly what "cannot" happen.
LOL!!! Popping in and out of existence is a figure of speech I've read in regard to this phenomenon. You have a point. They borrow the energy of the quantum vacuum and then return it. So, popping in and out of existence isn't exactly true.
How tightly is "Nothing comes from Nothing" tied to "Atomism?"
"Atomism" seems to postulate that the way the universe works with regularity is that there are eternal irreducible particles which when moving through empty space come together to form bodies, and that this process explains and underlies the regularity of all that we see.
Would a "plenum" (no empty space anywhere) work just as well?
If not, why not?
Nope, the plenum would be a black hole. Infinite density and energy. You can't make much out of that.
The atoms, produced out of the energy of the Big Bang, would never be "nothing" as nothing doesn't seem to exist. There is the vacuum of space-time which gives the atoms freedom to move and produce all the swell effects we see.
And in my view we have painful proof of why it's important to take a position
You're preaching to the choir. I think you need science backing up your philosophical positions.
So what position are you guys taking as to whether "empty space" exists?
It's there, it's just filled with virtual particles that pop in and out of existence, borrowing the energy of that empty space. All this in addition to the atoms that fly though them.
What is Quantum Fluctuation?|| scienceshorts||
So even a vacuum isn't exactly nothing.
Ancient drinking water sources left much to be desired. 😝 Not only the sanitation problem, which the alcohol in the wine would address, but the taste problem.
Adding wine to the water would make drinking water more palatable and drinkable.
Why did the ancient Greeks and Romans drink their wine mixed with water?
Does the article state that quantum foam really doesn't have any existence?
Not at all. It's stating that there is actual experimental evidence, the Casimir effect that demonstrates it does.
...But It's Free! 😀
Here's a take on tonight's first Monday theme of "Nothing Can Be Created From Nothing".
Nothing doesn't exist!
"Nothing" doesn't exist. Instead, there's "quantum foam" - Big Think
An updated version of Epicurus' idea of an infinite universe filled with infinite particles undergoing the swerve. All courtesy of quantum physics.
Enjoy! 😀
The question is: To what extent does hearing someone say that they are "feeling no pain" automatically invoke an association that what they mean is that they are "stoned?"
To me, it would be a great extent considering the times I lived in as a young man when I would hear the phrase now and again.
While I'm largely clueless about its connotations today among post baby boomers, a quick AI search tells me it's gained a wider scope. More escape from stresses in general rather than being "stoned". It's a reason that Stoicism has gained such wide interest among the post boomers.
Although stoned works! 🥴
The video mentions that the Vesuvius area was a famous resort area for the Roman elite.
Some time ago, I read an article that, on the NORTH side of Vesuvius, opposite Pompeii and Herculaneum, a villa was found where the Emperor Augustus died in 14 CE. Decades before the eruption that buried Herculaneum and Pompeii.
Enjoy!
Villa Belonging To Emperor Augustus Finally Unearthed Near Pompeii
Great video Joshua!
You know, what always impressed me about the preserved organic stuff in Herculaneum and Pompeii was the sectioned loaves of bread. They almost look like you can lay down a few coins and get your birthday cake shaped section of bread and continue down the street.
Unfortunately, they're all really stale. 
The form and recipe still exists. Here is a yummy reconstruction:
Happy 20th. See you next time!
Recently, on my UTube feed I got a video on ancient Rome and religion. The gist of which was that religion was inseparatable from the state and society. For example, the treasury in ancient Rome was also the Temple of Saturn. Atheism was almost unthinkable when society and religion were so tightly intertwined.
Of course, ancient Rome isn't ancient Greece, but I thought they might be similar and sure enough they were. Ancient Greek religion was deeply intertwined with Greek society in a similar way as in ancient Rome. It was the glue that held separate city states together with a common Greek identity. As this video shows:
Epicurus was and has widely been criticized for atheism, but he very likely was a theist with a different and realistic as opposed to idealistic view of the gods than was common. He even says so:
Good point.
This guy is a popular author. And, like you say, he's giving us his perspective from a self-help venue, which is what he knows.
His sort of article is going to be how most people are introduced Epicureanism.
They want the scholarly stuff we've got that here! 😉
Good point! The editing could have been a little bit better. 😄
Popular article on Epicureanism that I thought might be of interest. Fun read.
An alternative to stoicism that offers true contentment (yahoo.com)
Wow! 😮 I'm just astonished by that archery video! The bowmen must have been incredibly deadly.
Who needs a machine gun when you have skills like that.
