These article is a bit beyond me (without starting at the beginning and reading it all the way through, which I don't want to do).

Here is a definition from Wikipedia: "In Epicurean philosophy, katastematic pleasure is pleasure felt when being in a state of freedom from need or want, as opposed to kinetic pleasure, which is felt while performing a gratifying activity. ^[1][2] Absence of pain, aponia, and lack of disturbance of mind, ataraxia, are two of the katastematic pleasures and often seen as the focal ones to Epicurus."

Sometimes engaging in a kinetic pleasure results in katastematic pleasure -- for example: eating healthy food in just the right quantity, and the enjoyable activity (kinetic pleasure) only lasts maybe ten minutes while you are eating, but the katastematic pleasure lasts maybe 3 or so hours. Then maybe you get hungry again and would eat a small healthy snack to hold you over till your next meal.

I think it would be safe to say that all kinetic pleasures are good, but we may choose not to do them if they result in much worse pains, if they create undue anxiety or physical pain. PD 8 -

"No pleasure is bad in itself; but the means of paying for some pleasures bring with them disturbances many times greater than the pleasures themselves".

This all makes more sense if we think about the differences in people and preferences. An introvert will be more sensitive to internal bodily feelings and likely will put much more emphasis on feeling katastematic pleasure -- even being much more likely to sense the presence of katastesmatic pleasure compared to an extrovert. An extrovert is busy moving and doing things and processes bodily sensations differently than an introvert (and so may need to put more effort into practicing PD 8 making sure not to over-indulge in pleasures that produce bad pains or bad results in the future).

Here is another idea, just a rough sketch:

Hi GetulioVargasZ,

Welcome to the forum!

I saw your wall post, but this is a better place for starting a dialog, so that others can more easily see posts and participate.

If you would like to share a little about your background and any Epicurean books or topics that you have studied or are currently studying? And we would love to hear about what particular aspects of Epicureanism you most enjoy?

Here is an update for how to join the Zoom meeting:

-- For forum members who have not previously attended -- please post your interest to attend here on this thread and you will receive a private forum message with the Zoom link.

-- For non-member forum readers who have not previously attended -- the registration process will require the answering of a few simple "getting to know you" questions before we will give out the Zoom link through email. Please go to Eventbrite to register for tickets and receive further instructions.

-- If you have previously attended, you do not need to get tickets again. Instead if you are a forum member you should have already received a private forum message with the link.

Or, if you are not a forum member the link will emailed today to the address you used to register with Eventbrite.

Okay that's great to see it posted on Facebook!

We live in a time in which we have access to knowledge to scientifically understand phenomenon and we value science as the tool for the proper understanding of the world. Proper knowledge about the world dispels fear and anxiety and most importantly leads to making more prudent decisions. Proper knowledge also helps maintain peace of mind as a foundation from which to more deeply enjoy pleasures which arise.

After a recent move to a place which gets frequent thunderstorms, I noticed a lightening warning sign posted in a very big open park near where I live. I've lived most of my life in places with very few thunderstorms, so never had to think about it before. Here is a good read on the science of lightening. Also the National Weather service lightening safety tips.

Beyond observable phenonmena, there have been incorrect ideas (myths) in our current times which gain a following on the internet - for example past stories about a possible flip of magnetic poles -- read here about why not to panic. Rather than observable phenonmena, this is dealing with the hype we may encounter on the internet and in the news.

Yet there is other science which points toward very real potential future problems, such as a strong solar flare disrupting the power grid, all electronics, and the internet. I would be curious here to know how others think about such things -- and does pondering the uncertainty of the future bring us back around to focus on enjoying more sensory and active pleasures?

The closest think that comes to me regarding "homeostasis" is Vatican Saying 11 - "For most people, to be quiet is to be numb and to be active is to be frenzied." And so this is pointing at something which is neither.

Just like katastematic pleasure may be more highly valued for introverts, so too "homeostasis" may be more highly valued for introverts. Introverts are more sensitive to the internal feeling of the body.

Don I don't remember if there is an article or discussion you may have posted some time ago on "homeostasis"? Or if you can post a link to an earlier discussion?

Hi Everyone -- Our next Zoom meeting will focus on PD13 and PD14 -- Please join us again! This meeting is open for new attendees to join as well.

-- We are making a few adjustments to the registration process and the way that we give access to the weekly Zoom meeting link. For those who attended last week, please rest assured that our new changes will guarantee for a pleasant and enjoyable meeting.

-- If you have previously attended, you do not need to get tickets again -- you will automatically receive a private forum message if you are a forum member, or, if you are not a forum member you will automatically receive an email to the address you used to register with Eventbrite. The message or email will contain the Zoom meeting link, and it will be sent out 30 minutes before the start of the meeting.

-- For forum members who have not previously attended -- please post to this thread your interest in attending, and you will be added into the list of members who will receive a private forum message with the Zoom link.

-- For non-member forum readers who have not previously attended -- the registration process will require the answering of a few simple "getting to know you" questions before we will give out the Zoom link. Please go to Eventbrite to register for tickets and receive further instructions.

We look forward to seeing you at our next meeting!

I am really enjoying this thread!! (and I need to re-read from beginning to end, as may have missed reading a few entries). For me all of this discussion is the basis of well-being and happiness. And we can see what Epicurus may or may not have said. And we can also apply all of this in a practical way.

For example, yesterday I had a wonderful lunch with a good friend and I felt both very satisfied and also that I had eaten more than what I needed (and so felt overly full). But then not too much later after that, the idea of getting ice cream came to me, but I waited a few hours before getting some. The pleasure of the ice cream lasted only a short time, and then I felt too full again. So what was this craving, I wondered. Then I wondered if eating ice cream was a way to try to deal with any feelings of uncertainty, or was is boredom?

I have to say that for me, I am starting to see how eating just enough to relieve hunger provides a sense of well-being that "feels better" and "lasts longer" than eating when you aren't really hungry.

Quote from Cassius

Everyone would intuitively want the longer portion, so what Epicurus is doing is showing a way of looking at the issue that satisfies us that we are not missing anything new and categorically different by not having the longer time....

...This is something that a pig cannot do, but also something that does not appear (to us) to bother the pig. We have the need for the analysis only because it bothers us if we don't.

This to me points to some deeper ideas that I would love to get into, however I am short on time today so will have to come back to this later. I would say that if anyone closely observes the nature and experience of pleasure over time, then it will make sense.

Eikadistes, for some reason my tablet doesn't want to open the second two images. You might have better software for making graphics -- can you make this pig white with a yellow circle behind it?

Quote from Cassius

I would also like a graphic version that can be added to the right-hand panel of graphics, probably right underneath the explanation of the EpicureanFriends logo. Something that looks like a flag, perhaps incorporating a circle or other reference to the sun

Quote from Cassius

The young animal is in an innocent state of nature and has not yet learned the fears and hatreds that cause pain in human life.

And pigs have no thumbs

I could create a graphic, will see what I can come up with

"All pleasures seem to involve the same hedonic brain systems" -- that would support PD 9.

Ha, I didn't get to the end of that article yet to see if it says anything about importance of meaning (but "Divine fire" would probably fall into that category).

Hi Philliped1 and welcome to the forum.

You wrote that you have peace of mind now, but yet friends, family, and society seem to suggest that singleness isn't "normal", and then this causes you to question if you are missing out on something -- even though in the past you were in several long-term relationships.

When it comes to either being single or in a relationship, I think Epicureanism would say that it would simply be a matter of personal preference. If you are happier being single than that sounds great, and maybe it is more about knowing how to handle what other people's perspectives or opinions are about being in a relationship?

Relationships can be difficult at times, and can take effort, but they should bring more pleasure than pain, and when too much pain arises then there are underlying causes which could be worked through with the help of a therapist. From the time we are born, we all learn about love from our parents and how they interacted with us (the mother-child bond) and with each other (read this about attachment theory).

You might find this very long thread on romantic love of interest:

Post

An Epicurean Understanding of Valentine's Day: Love, Romance, and Free-will

Valentine's Day is one month away...how do we make sense of romance and love within the "Epicurean worldview". Is romantic love in direct opposition of the wisdom of free-will?

[…]

Diogenes Laertius :

Book 10, Sections 84-154

"They do not think that the wise man will ever be in love, nor that he will be anxious about his burial, nor that love is a passion inspired by the gods, as Diogenes says in his twelfth book. They also assert that he will be indifferent to the study of oratory. Intercourse,…

Kalosyni

January 16, 2022 at 1:19 AM

I just started reading this article "Neuroscience of Happiness and Pleasure" and here is an excerpt:

Quote

The available evidence suggests that brain mechanisms involved in fundamental pleasures (food and sexual pleasures) overlap with those for higher-order pleasures (for example, monetary, artistic, musical, altruistic, and transcendent pleasures) (Kringelbach 2010).

From sensory pleasures and drugs of abuse to monetary, aesthetic and musical delights, all pleasures seem to involve the same hedonic brain systems, even when linked to anticipation and memory. Pleasures important to happiness, such as socializing with friends, and related traits of positive hedonic mood are thus all likely to draw upon the same neurobiological roots that evolved for

sensory pleasures. The neural overlap may offer a way to generalize from fundamental pleasures that are best understood and so infer larger hedonic brain principles likely to contribute to happiness.

 

The Neuroscience of Happiness and Pleasure

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

beasain, Mathitis Kipouros, and Cassius -- I am now re-reading these threads a bit more closely and am seeing that it might be good to construct some kind of a table or graphic which might show that actually there is evidence in Epicurean teachings for both a "just enough pleasure" and a "full cup of pleasure". All of this has come up before and it really would be good to have it all layed out clearly. Seeing it in a table or graphic form could also make it easier for when future questions arise. Also, a table might have several different columns to compare and contrast, and give evidence for or against.

Quote from Cassius

Even at risk of forever disqualifying yourself from the world of Modern Stoicism????

Yes

The Stoics would say that Epicureans are only friends for purposes of utility, but that isn't true.

VS 23: Every friendship is an excellence in itself, even though it begins in mutual advantage.

Clearly in friendship there is also a risk of pain, in if your friend moves away or dies you will feel the pain of the loss of that friendship. But I see the "Epicurean Garden" is a place of many friends. So then that would be a consolation, as one is surrounded by more than just one friend.

Quote from camotero

B. After eliminating pain, all pleasures beyond this limit, are embellishments. Embellishment pleasures are great! Try to experience as most as you can (carefully calculating not to produce more pain for you down the line). Let these guide your life if you want even, but keep in mind the following point.

C. The limit of pleasure has been met. All of these embellishments don't add up more pleasure to your life. You won't experience them after you're dead, and you certainly won't take any memories of them to an afterlife. The maximum natural quanitity of pleasure has been obtained when you eliminated all the pain, so if you want to stay at that, IT'S OK! If you want to go for more embellishments, IT'S OK! Just be weary of the slippery slope of wanting more of something that won't add more pleasure and may become a source of much pain.

Quote from Cassius

I find that there are basically two camps:

Camp One - People who focus on the "absence of pain" passages and conclude that "avoid all pain to the extent possible" is the supreme guide of Epicurean philosophy, without regard to the pleasure that is thereby forgone.

Camp Two:. People who focus on "pleasure" as that term is ordinarily understood, embracing all forms of mental and physical enjoyment, and who conclude that the correct statement of the primary guide is that pleasure is the focus and is to be pursued so long as we ourselves deem the resulting feeling of pleasure to be worth the cost in pain needed to obtain it.

Everyone has different tolerances for pain, and different valuations of pleasure, so it's really impossible to make the generic statement of Camp Two more precise than that. There is no absolute set of pleasures always to pursue or pains always to avoid.

I would like to propose that friendship is a pleasure which every Epicurean should cultivate.

PD 27: Of all the things that wisdom provides for the complete happiness of one's entire life, by far the greatest is friendship.

VS 52: Friendship dances around the world, announcing to each of us that we must awaken to happiness.

In our modern world when we are all so short on time it might seem that friendship is an embellishment, but I would say that friendship is not an embellishment. One certainly could live as a hermit free from pain, but would be much lacking in the joy that comes with engaging and spending time with a good friend or friends. And it must be cultivated -- finding good friends, making time, and also behaving in an enjoyable way toward each other -- choosing enjoyable things to talk about, finding humor and fun and sharing fun activities. The feelings of friendship are far deeper and surpass the simple enjoyments of food, music, etc. of the simple physical sensations.

Hi Everyone, Join us again this Wednesday at 8:30pm ET

PD 11 -- If we were not troubled by our suspicions of the phenomena of the sky and about death, fearing that it concerns us, and also by our failure to grasp the limits of pains and desires, we should have no need of natural science.

PD 12-- A man cannot dispel his fear about the most important matters if he does not know what is the nature of the universe but suspects the truth of some mythical story. So that without natural science it is not possible to attain our pleasures unalloyed.

-- An example of Greek myths: The Earth on Fire: A Weather Folklore - The ancient Greeks created an elaborate myth to explain heat waves and droughts.

New attendees are welcome join, please sign up through Eventbrite click here to go to Eventbrite page.

Quote from Cassius

Maybe it's just me but I see quite a difference between the two approaches

Yes, for many reasons there really is a big difference. The strong emphasis in Epicureanism on choices and avoidances, and personal responsibility leads to a much better outcome, I think.

If a person ends up repeatedly chanting that desire, aversion, and ignorance are inexhaustable (by nature), then they are in a sense giving away their power and also stating a distrust in the ability of the mind to reason correctly.