I have thoughts on the word "goal" for τέλος ... But that'll have to wait until this evening.
Posts by Don
New Graphics: Are You On Team Epicurus? | Comparison Chart: Epicurus vs. Other Philosophies | Chart Of Key Epicurean Quotations | Accelerating Study Of Canonics Through Philodemus' "On Methods Of Inference" | Note to all users: If you have a problem posting in any forum, please message Cassius
-
-
Just finishing lunch at work. For later reference...
-
Thanks Don --- the second link worked fine but not the first -- looks like there's maybe an error in "entry=a)reth" in that link?
Try it now. Thanks!
-
ΑΡΕΤΗ (my misspelling previously)
Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott, A Greek-English Lexicon, ἀρετή
Virtus
Charlton T. Lewis, Charles Short, A Latin Dictionary, virtūs
-
I think you have to start even more basic.
What is virtue?
Αρήτη (arete) means something wider than what we tend to think of as "virtue."
And Latin virtus is bound up with being "manly" being a vir.
-
While I certainly see where Cassius is coming from in his posts above and I don't think he's saying what I'm adding next, I want to add that Epicureans are not going to go looking for or initiating "conflict/confrontation and danger."
Would an Epicurean defend herself against attack? Of course! To protect one's life is of paramount importance.
Would an Epicurean confront an injustice and support means to alleviate that injustice? Yes, most likely, but they would seek to understand the context.
Would an Epicurean willingly risk danger for a friend? Absolutely!
But I'm highly skeptical of the Epicurean putting themselves in harm's way needlessly or recklessly. I don't see the Epicurean "picking a fight." Will they fight if the alternative is more pain? Yes. That's the difference I want to emphasize in this thread from my perspective.
-
It may be observed in passing that St. Paul quoted the words Peace and Safety as catchwords of the Epicureans, to whom he refused the honor of mention by name.69
For the record: Footnote 69 is merely a citation to 1 Thessalonians 5:3. Nothing to support Dewitt's contention it was an Epicurean "catchword" is contained in that footnote.
-
Regretfully I am going to have to announce another one week postponement of this episode.
You're just building anticipation
-
It sure would but Don that link doesn't work for me.
Let's try again...
-
Would Perseus' Lamb translation be helpful?
https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?do…80%3atext%3dTim.
-
411 sounds more like the Biblical and Gilgamesh floods... Or just floods in general.
Again, from all I've seen, there's nothing to show Atlantis was a real place.
-
The MEGA hats, honestly, give me pause even though I get the tongue in cheek aspect.
Is it possible or even desirable to get the piglet or SFOTSE or even a graphic Epicurus on a hat?
-
Well well, I was reading one of the four letters a few days ago, the one to Pythocles
The podcast team did a great job in going through that letter. There's a lot more going on in there than I realized:
Lucretius Today Episode Guide - Epicureanfriends.comwww.epicureanfriends.com -
All evidence points to Plato making Atlantis up for rhetorical purposes. Everybody points back to him. The podcast series I posted does a good job of debunking the myth, and also goes into the nasty white supremacist uses of the myth as well.
-
CASSIUS ADMIN NOTE: I am splitting this off from another thread (link here)so as not to divert that one. My main interest at the moment is to trace back in outline form the question of what the Epicureans and/or other ancients might have thought about this question, given the importance of the Timaeus in Greek ideas about world history and the nature of the world as a whole. Don's links may answer that question already but I think the topic is worthy of being clear so we can relate that aspect to the rest of Plato's discussion of creation and world history.
Was the entire story of Atlantis, and/or the rest of his creation story, understood by the ancients to be allegorical?
This is the source (or part of the source) of the story of Atlantis, so it's interesting for lots of reasons.
Just for the record, there was no physical place called Atlantis. It is entirely a literary invention of Plato to make a philosophical point.
Atlantis - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.orgWhile some leave open the idea that Plato may have been *inspired* by accounts of the eruption of Thera or other events, the "myth of Atlantis" is just that - a myth.
The podcast Let's Talk About Myths, Baby! did an excellent series on Atlantis:
Atlantis — Let's Talk About Myths, Baby!www.mythsbaby.com -
This is the source (or part of the source) of the story of Atlantis, so it's interesting for lots of reasons.
Just for the record, there was no physical place called Atlantis. It is entirely a literary invention of Plato to make a philosophical point.
Atlantis - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.orgWhile some leave open the idea that Plato may have been *inspired* by accounts of the eruption of Thera or other events, the "myth of Atlantis" is just that - a myth.
The podcast Let's Talk About Myths, Baby! did an excellent series on Atlantis:
Atlantis — Let's Talk About Myths, Baby!www.mythsbaby.com -
Welcome aboard!
-
For anyone who would like to see my script along with notes and citations to the ancient texts (along with excerpts), I've uploaded that file to the forum at:
Bread and Water: Debunking the Idea of Epicurean Asceticism - Text and Notes
Did Epicurus advocate for an “ascetic way of life” or not?
-
Welcome aboard, Singleton ! Thanks for sharing your path here.
I arrived at Epicureanism by way of Stoicism.
You'll find that a common thread for many of us.
having flirted with, then abandoned, Buddhism, I found this ancient Greek philosophy to be a breath of fresh air
Ditto on the Buddhism.
The almost modern perspective of Epicurus definitely made me take notice. Now, I'll have been a member of this forum (I always feel I should say agora since Epicurus was Greek ) five years now next month. It is a welcoming place. Enjoy the stay!
-
Does not this mean there is a separation between our theory and our practice? If Newton works in the real world, perhaps he is mostly all we need.
Wading into an area in which I have no expertise...
It seems to me that Newton handles the big picture, Einstein allowed us to see the relative nature of the cosmos, and quantum physics handles the cosmos at the submicroscopic world in all its weirdness. My understanding is that Newton, Einstein, and quantum mechanics all explain the realms that they intend to explain. Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle doesn't break through into the macro world but that doesn't mean it's not operating.
Finding Things At EpicureanFriends.com
Here is a list of suggested search strategies:
- Website Overview page - clickable links arrranged by cards.
- Forum Main Page - list of forums and subforums arranged by topic. Threads are posted according to relevant topics. The "Uncategorized subforum" contains threads which do not fall into any existing topic (also contains older "unfiled" threads which will soon be moved).
- Search Tool - icon is located on the top right of every page. Note that the search box asks you what section of the forum you'd like to search. If you don't know, select "Everywhere."
- Search By Key Tags - curated to show frequently-searched topics.
- Full Tag List - an alphabetical list of all tags.